Physical Growth and Biological Maturation of Children and Adolescents: Proposed Reference Curves

Abstract

Background/Aim: The study of physical growth variables in terms of chronological age and biological maturation may provide a common reference point to reflect on the occurrence of body dimensions in and between individuals. The objectives of this study were as follows: (a) verify if the observed gender differences in the variables of physical growth by chronological age are confounded by physical maturation, (b) compare physical growth patterns with the reference of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-2012, and (c) develop regional curves to assess physical growth in terms of biological maturation. Methods: Researchers studied 3,674 children and adolescents. Weight, standing height, and sitting height were measured. Biological maturation was determined by using the age of peak velocity growth. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Growth variables were compared with the CDC-2012 reference. Percentiles were calculated by the LMS method. The students differed in weight and BMI when compared to the reference individuals. The differences in weight, standing height, and BMI between both genders are more pronounced when they are aligned with biological age rather than chronological age. Conclusion: Weight and BMI differ from the reference. Furthermore, the assessment of the physical growth trajectory should be analyzed in terms of biological maturation. The proposed regional curves may be used in and applied to clinical and epidemiological contexts.

Leveling the Playing Field: A New Proposed Method to Address Relative Age- and Maturity-Related Bias in UK Male Academy Soccer Players

“…The 50th Percentile (P50) of the normative growth curve of the Belgian population (Hauspie et al, 1993 ) was used to establish the developmental birthdate (Leite Portella et al, 2017 ). The anthropometric characteristics of each player were plotted on the corresponding 50th percentile curve to determine the player's ED age for stature.…”

Movement Matters! Understanding the Developmental Trajectory of Embodied Planning

“…Across the lifespan, human experience consists of an alternation of phases characterized by rapid change and phases of greater stability. In phases of change, embodiment effects can be captured particularly well: When our bodies change more dramatically and motor skills improve notably, as during infancy, childhood, and adolescence (Portella et al, 2017 ; Adolph and Hoch, 2019 ), or in older age (Cole et al, 2019 ), the impact of these changes on cognitive processes can be more easily scrutinized, and a time-ordered, causal direction can be tested.…”

https://revistas.uautonoma.cl/index.php/ijmss/article/view/472

“…The velocity of the biological growth and development during different ages of children and youth show variable intensity, depending on their life stage. The commencement of the rapid adolescent growth corresponds with the beginning of the puberty stage (Fryar et al, 2012;Granados et al, 2015;Komlos & Breitfelder, 2007;Portella et al, 2017;Stang & Story, 2005;). According to Rogol et al (2000), since children often have growth spurts, yearly growth velocities are more accurately determined by taking annual measurements of the body height rather than from intervals shorter than one year.…”