2012
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/2/023041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical interpretation of the Wigner rotations and its implications for relativistic quantum information

Abstract: We present a new treatment for the spin of a massive relativistic particle in the context of quantum information based on a physical interpretation of the Wigner rotations, obtaining different results in relation to previous works. We are led to the conclusion that it is not possible to define a reduced density matrix for the particle spin and that the Pauli-Lubanski (or similar) spin operators are not suitable for describing measurements where the spin couples to an electromagnetic field in the measuring appa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was shown that these violations critically depend on the type of spin operator involved [22,23] even when the finite wavepacket width effects [24,25] are not taken into account, since not all such operators [26] satisfy the necessary commutation relations [27]. In general, properties of relativistic spin are responsible for many features of relativistic quantum information theory that distinguish it from its nonrelativistic counterpart [11,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was shown that these violations critically depend on the type of spin operator involved [22,23] even when the finite wavepacket width effects [24,25] are not taken into account, since not all such operators [26] satisfy the necessary commutation relations [27]. In general, properties of relativistic spin are responsible for many features of relativistic quantum information theory that distinguish it from its nonrelativistic counterpart [11,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we do not know if such a coupling exists in nature. If spin couples to an electromagnetic field in the measuring apparatus, like in the Stern-Gerlach measurements, the spin operators must transform as part of a tensor under Lorentz transformations to guarantee the invariance of the outcomes probabilities, with different predictions in relation to the Pauli-Lubanski treatment [23].For the reasons described in the previous paragraphs, we believe that the analysis of spin quantum correlations of relativistic systems must be revisited. Here we apply our method to the case of two entangled spin-1/2 massive particles to show how the maximum amount of violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) version of Bell's inequalities [3] depends on the velocity distribution of the particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in our recent work [23] we discussed that to use the Pauli-Lubanski (or similar) spin operators to describe spin measurements, spin must couple to a quantity that transforms as part of a 4-vector under Lorentz transformations in the measuring apparatus. But we do not know if such a coupling exists in nature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gordon decomposition [19] may be useful in the analysis of electromagnetic interactions of charged particles. In this connection, the experimental review paper [22] which clearly distinguishes the spin angular momentum and the magnetic moment of the high-energy electron is valuable; this reference emphasizes the fact that a Stern-Gerlach apparatus, on which the argument of [35] is based, is useless for the electron we are interested in. The weak interaction we discussed can, in principle, measure the helicity of elementary particles directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%