2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties and cellular responses to crosslinkable poly(propylene fumarate)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites

Abstract: A series of crosslinkable nanocomposites has been developed using hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF). PPF/HA nanocomposites with four different weight fractions of HA nanoparticles have been characterized in terms of thermal and mechanical properties. To assess surface chemistry of crosslinked PPF/HA nanocomposites, their hydrophilicity and capability of adsorbing proteins have been determined using static contact angle measurement and MicroBCA protein assay kit after incubati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
119
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
119
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM micrographs demonstrated morphology and microstructure of n-HA/gel and n-HA/gel/CMC composite scaffold which show optimal pore size in accordance to accommodate, infiltrate and proliferate cells. As reported compressive modulus of human trabecular bone, 33,34 our results shows that these composite scaffolds have sufficient mechanical strength and also due to their viscoelasticity in wet condition they can be cut, deform, and fit according to bone defects which allows them to use it in case of bone cyst and large defects with smaller opening. The viscoelastic property of the composites inhibits unexpected breakage of the material and formation of debris from the surface during surgical operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The SEM micrographs demonstrated morphology and microstructure of n-HA/gel and n-HA/gel/CMC composite scaffold which show optimal pore size in accordance to accommodate, infiltrate and proliferate cells. As reported compressive modulus of human trabecular bone, 33,34 our results shows that these composite scaffolds have sufficient mechanical strength and also due to their viscoelasticity in wet condition they can be cut, deform, and fit according to bone defects which allows them to use it in case of bone cyst and large defects with smaller opening. The viscoelastic property of the composites inhibits unexpected breakage of the material and formation of debris from the surface during surgical operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In particular, while the surfaces of many synthetic polymers have low cell affinity, cell-friendly surface HA nanoparticles counteracted the disadvantages of the synthetic polymer PPF/DEF. Yaszemski et al studied the physical properties and cellular responses of poly (propylene fumarate)/HA nanocomposites (26). Liska et al investigated gelatin hydrolysate, which was mixed with reactive diluents, and HA to enhance mechanical strength (23).…”
Section: Stereolithography (Sl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the strength of porous scaffold is relatively low which limits its application. In order to overcome these limitations, Lee et al successfully fabricated poly(propylene fumarate)/hydroxyapatite (PPF/HA) nanocomposites by crosslinking HA nanoparticles and PPF (Lee et al 2008). The PPF/HA nanocomposites showed excellent mechanical strength and osteoconductivity and may serve as a scaffolding material for bone tissue engineering applications (Lee et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to overcome these limitations, Lee et al successfully fabricated poly(propylene fumarate)/hydroxyapatite (PPF/HA) nanocomposites by crosslinking HA nanoparticles and PPF (Lee et al 2008). The PPF/HA nanocomposites showed excellent mechanical strength and osteoconductivity and may serve as a scaffolding material for bone tissue engineering applications (Lee et al 2008). However, HA may limit new bone tissue ingrowth due to its poor in vivo biodegradability (Renooij et al 1985) when PPF/HA is implanted into bone defects though HA possesses excellent biocompatibility and osteoconductive property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%