1999
DOI: 10.4141/s98-053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of a Chernozemic clay loam soil under long-term conventional tillage and no-till

Abstract: a Chernozemic clay loam soil under long-term conventional tillage and no-till. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79: 325-331. Conservation tillage practices such as no-till (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) with a heavy-duty cultivator can influence the physical properties of soils. This study was conducted to determine the effect of 24 yr of NT versus CT on the physical properties of a clay loam soil in southern Alberta. Physical properties quantified were bulk density (BD), mean weight diameter (MWD), plant-available water… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under conservation tillage with 5 yr without ploughing, soil physical properties have relatively low variability compared to other results using similar soil tillage (Miller et al, 1999). As for CT, an effect of wheel traffic on q b (P < 0.001) was found with the highest values under trafficked inter-rows as also reported by Vervoort et al (2001) and Blanco-Canqui et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under conservation tillage with 5 yr without ploughing, soil physical properties have relatively low variability compared to other results using similar soil tillage (Miller et al, 1999). As for CT, an effect of wheel traffic on q b (P < 0.001) was found with the highest values under trafficked inter-rows as also reported by Vervoort et al (2001) and Blanco-Canqui et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Under conservation tillage with 5 yr without ploughing, soil physical properties have relatively low variability compared to other results using similar soil tillage (Miller et al. , 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Loftis et al (2001) suggest that the greatest power of the paired watershed approach is obtained when the sample sizes for the calibration and treatment periods are approximately equal. Because it can take a number of years after conversion to a conservation tillage system for the soil to “stabilize” (Perfect et al, 1990; Miller et al, 1999), the data were separated into three principal time periods: (i) preconversion/calibration (1993–1996), (ii) postconversion‐transitional (1997–2003), and (iii) postconversion‐treatment (2004–2007) (Table 1). This gave calibration and treatment periods of equal length for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 grouped within 15-yr time steps. Campbell et al (1996a), Campbell et al (1996b), Campbell et al (1995), Larney et al (1997), Nyborg et al (1995), Campbell et al (2001), Grant andLaFond, 1994, McConkey et al (2003), Hao et al (2001a), Elliott and Efetha (1999); Dormaar and Carefoot (1998), Franzluebbers and Arshad (1996), Miller et al (1999), Angers et al (1997), Campbell et al (1991), Bremer et al (1994), Campbell et al (1998), Biederbeck et al (1998), Campbell et al (2000a, Campbell et al (2000b), Campbell and Zentner (1993), Bremer et al (2002), Nyborg et al (1998), Nyborg et al (1999), Malhi et al (1997), Solberg et al (1997), Liang and Mackenzie (1992), Gregorich et al (1996), Malhi et al (2002), and Izaurralde et al (2001).…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon In Croplandmentioning
confidence: 95%