1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199909)79:12<1642::aid-jsfa412>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of starch of Asian-adapted potato varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there were no significant differences found with increasing enzyme concentration as listed in Table . Our results were basically in line with those reported in the previous studies . Zhou et al found that the legume starches treated with pancreatic α‐amylase showed a little increase in the gelatinization temperature, whereas the value of ΔH gel was decreased.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, there were no significant differences found with increasing enzyme concentration as listed in Table . Our results were basically in line with those reported in the previous studies . Zhou et al found that the legume starches treated with pancreatic α‐amylase showed a little increase in the gelatinization temperature, whereas the value of ΔH gel was decreased.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The gelatinization temperatures and enthalpy changes of native starches are shown in Table 5, which displays values close to those found in the literature (HOOVER, 2001;DEMIATE;FRANCO, 2008;GANGA;CORKE, 1999). After statistical analysis, it was observed that the gelatinization temperatures (T o , T p , T c ) and ΔH for all starches remained unchanged after hydrolysis, except for the peak temperature of the hydrolyzed cassava starch that was lightly lower when compared with the native cassava starch.…”
Section: Thermal Propertiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…(1995) reported amylose contents varying from 24.4 to 27.3% for four potato cultivars, whereas Ganga and Corke (1999) showed values varying from 20.1 to 35.1% for twenty-four potato genotypes.…”
Section: Thermal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DH of both Bola and Dik were higher than those reported for genotypes of sweet potato (12.9 J/g, Collado et al, 1999), potato (14.9 J/g, Ganga & Corke, 1999), taro (6.8 J/g, Jane et al, 1992), but lower than that reported for genotypes of yam (19.8 J/g, Farhat et al, 1999). The gelatinization characteristics of many other tuber starches have been determined by Kofler hot stage microscopy.…”
Section: Gelatinization Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…T o of both Bola and Dik were higher than those reported for genotypes of potato (63.1°C, Ganga & Corke, 1999), sweet potato (64.6°C, Collado, Mabesa, & Corke, 1999), taro (43°C, Jane et al, 1992) and Yam (73.8°C, Farhat, Oguntona, & Neale, 1999). The T c of Dik (90.9°C) was beyond the values reported for genotypes of sweet potato (84.6°C; Ganga & Corke, 1999), potato (77.7°C, Collado et al, 1999), taro (63.3°C, Jane et al, 1992) and Yam (81.8°C, Farhat et al, 1999). However, T c of Bola (87.4°C) was closer to the value for sweet potato.…”
Section: Gelatinization Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 68%