1992
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400230029005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Restraints in the Practice of Medicine

Abstract: Despite their extensive use, there is virtually no evidence to support the efficacy of restraints. The risks of using mechanical restraints are numerous and well documented. The detrimental psychologic impact of restraints needs to be emphasized. Restraints are inappropriately used if employed because of fear of liability should a patient fall. The proper approach to the patient at risk of falling is to address the contributing factors that place the patient at risk and, where possible, correct them. Restraint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many adverse effects of PR use have been reported (3)(4)(5)(6). Proposed but debatable reasons for the use of physical restraints include protection of confused elderly in the case of severe psychomotor agitation, delirium, increased risk of falling, or to enable treatment (7)(8)(9)(10). Wrist, waist, and chairfixation methods are used.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many adverse effects of PR use have been reported (3)(4)(5)(6). Proposed but debatable reasons for the use of physical restraints include protection of confused elderly in the case of severe psychomotor agitation, delirium, increased risk of falling, or to enable treatment (7)(8)(9)(10). Wrist, waist, and chairfixation methods are used.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 23 articles published more than 10 years ago [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , three in the last 10 years [35] , [36] , [37] , and our articles in the last five years [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines for the use of restraint in healthcare settings have been formulated by four sources (Fenton & Fenton 1987; Health Care Financing Administration 1989;Marks 1992; Bosek 1993; British Society for Disability and Oral Health 2004). These guidelines share four common features.…”
Section: Guidelines For the Use Of Restraint In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%