2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical study of the impact of injector design on mixing, convection and turbulence in ladle metallurgy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of numerical modeling could be verified by the same mixing times for KCl solution of experimental and simulated results, the agreement of velocity field between simulated result and the PIV result in Gajjar's work [51], and the same diffusion paths for color dye of experimental result and KCl solution of simulated result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reliability of numerical modeling could be verified by the same mixing times for KCl solution of experimental and simulated results, the agreement of velocity field between simulated result and the PIV result in Gajjar's work [51], and the same diffusion paths for color dye of experimental result and KCl solution of simulated result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The comparison of Figure 6a,b shows that the velocity magnitudes of water in the model ladle; except the plume zone of the PIV, result are almost the same as that of the simulated result. In Gajjar's work [51], since the bubble plume is very dense, the void fraction in this region is very high. Consequently, fewer tracers could be detected for the evaluation of the flow field.…”
Section: Verification For Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is discussed extensively in the next chapter. Some previous experimental studies [28,29] suggest that bubble coagulation and breakup have an influence on the flow. However, the governing mechanisms of coagulation and breakup are not fully understood and still require additional research, especially in liquid metals.…”
Section: Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, various works have been reported in literature with contrasting conclusions, such as the investigations carried out by Krishna Murthy and his colleagues [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] in which the authors conclude that the measurements obtained of the mixing time do not depend on the location neither on the tracer amount released with which the conductivity technique is performed. On the other hand, various authors conclude that not only the location of the sensors 22) affects the mixing time measurements but also the location of the tracer addition [23][24][25] is a variable that considerably affects the time required to reach a homogeneity degree of 95%. The discrepancies between authors have given rise to discussions and communications 26) between authors with reference to the relevance of the influence that a location of the addition of the tracer has on the experimental measurements of mixing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%