2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicians reading and writing practices: a cross-sectional study from Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract: BackgroundTo determine the behavior of physicians regarding medical literature reading and participation in research activities at one of the largest teaching hospitals in Pakistan.MethodThis descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted by interviewing the house officers, residents and fellows of six major specialties (Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Psychology, Obstetrics & Gynecology and Anesthesia) in Civil Hospital, Karachi between August and December, 2011. The questionnaire elicited responses regardin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Latin American intensivists preferred online resources as the source of scientific information, similar to U.S. physicians [ 33 ]. Among our respondents, the rate of reading scientific studies was lower than reported in other studies [ 34 ]. Because ICU academic status was not a determinant for scientific reading, knowledge acquisition seems to rely on personal interests.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Latin American intensivists preferred online resources as the source of scientific information, similar to U.S. physicians [ 33 ]. Among our respondents, the rate of reading scientific studies was lower than reported in other studies [ 34 ]. Because ICU academic status was not a determinant for scientific reading, knowledge acquisition seems to rely on personal interests.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Adding spin to the abstract of an article may mislead physicians who are attempting to draw conclusions about a treatment for patients. Most physicians read only the article abstract the majority of the time, while up to 25% of editorial decisions are based on the abstract alone 23–25. Those who write clinical trial manuscripts know that they have a limited amount of time and space in which to capture the attention of the reader.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(MacLeod, et al, 2013: p. 132) New trends of the research in this field started to focus on physicians and nurses and the way they read, write, etc. (Khaliq, et al, 2012;Peinhardt & Hagler, 2012). Furthermore, scientists established a new trend whereby language aspects could be linked together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%