2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-017-0254-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical and in vitro digestion characteristics of size-different red ginseng powders

Abstract: The aims of the present study were to prepare different-sized red ginseng powders and investigate the particle size effect on the release property of ginsenosides in in vitro digestion conditions. Ultrafine powder showed bimodal particle size distribution with a large peak at around 100 μm and small peak at around 10 μm, differently from fine powder showing unimodal distribution at 100 μm. The specific surface areas of fine- and ultrafine powders were 48.72 ± 6.41 and 86.74 ± 5.96 m/g, respectively. Time-depen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d) showed that ginseng particles displayed various irregular shapes and a solid surface with slight cracks, which were characteristic of pulverized herb particles. 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1d) showed that ginseng particles displayed various irregular shapes and a solid surface with slight cracks, which were characteristic of pulverized herb particles. 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d) showed that ginseng particles displayed various irregular shapes and a solid surface with slight cracks, which were characteristic of pulverized herb particles. 28 Agglomerations were evident in UGP, indicated by aggregates formed by smaller particles or debris adhered or overlapped to larger ones; the formed aggregates either existed independently or came close to each other to form bigger aggregates (arrows in Fig. 2a-1).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Different Ginseng Powdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the classical extraction methods of CM and natural products mainly include decoction [25,26], maceration [27][28][29], reflux [30,31], percolation [21], steam distillation [32] and sublimation [33,34]. With the development of modern separation science and equipment, some new technologies such as ultrasonic waveassisted extraction (UAE) [35][36][37][38], microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [39][40][41][42], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [43][44][45][46][47], enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) [48,23,49], membrane separation extraction (MSE) [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], ultrafine grinding technology (UGT) [58][59][60][61][62][63][64], microporous resin adsorption technology (MRAT) [65][66][67][68]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the classical extraction methods of CM and natural products mainly include decoction [25, 26], maceration [27–29], reflux [30, 31], percolation [21], steam distillation [32] and sublimation [33, 34]. With the development of modern separation science and equipment, some new technologies such as ultrasonic wave‐assisted extraction (UAE) [35–38], microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) [39–42], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [43–47], enzyme‐assisted extraction (EAE) [48, 23, 49], membrane separation extraction (MSE) [50–57], ultrafine grinding technology (UGT) [58–64], microporous resin adsorption technology (MRAT) [65–70], semi‐bionic extraction (SBE) [71, 72], immune selective extraction (ISE) [73–77], molecular‐distillation technology [78–82], molecularly‐imprinted polymer extraction (MIPE) [83–88], UPE [89–93], liquid chromatographic extraction (LCE) [94–99], solid‐phase extraction (SPE) [100–107], liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) [108–112], etc. have been given birth to.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation