2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical changes in a model protein bar during storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
90
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial Aw of the cassava flour-based bars was lower than that reported by Aigster et al (2011) (0.69) in granola bars, which significantly increased over the first week of storage up to the value of 0.77. A high initial value (0.65) was also found by Loveday et al (2009) in protein bars during storage of 50 days at 20 °C. These results highlight the importance of using more mechanized processes and more appropriate films, such as those used with for cassava flour-based bars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial Aw of the cassava flour-based bars was lower than that reported by Aigster et al (2011) (0.69) in granola bars, which significantly increased over the first week of storage up to the value of 0.77. A high initial value (0.65) was also found by Loveday et al (2009) in protein bars during storage of 50 days at 20 °C. These results highlight the importance of using more mechanized processes and more appropriate films, such as those used with for cassava flour-based bars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The cassava flour-based bars as well as those mentioned by Loveday et al (2009), when studying granola bars, were heterogeneous due to the presence of fruit and nut fragments and had the appearance of an aggregate of coarse particles This rough appearance adds value, characterizes the food bars, and may explain the variations in the results given the homogenization before the analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Food shelf life is defined as the time period between the packing of a product and its use, during which the product maintains good sensory characteristics and safe microbial parameters that are acceptable for consumption (Loverday et al, 2009). When a product is stored, sensory attributes are highly important for the marketing of the product (Giménez et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Cultivars Chenopodium Quinoa Brs Piabiru Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A w in the present study had a small variation (0.02) over the storage period of 147 days, but it was enough to decrease the instrumental hardness of the granola (Table 2). This decrease may have been due to chemical or physical reactions, such as melting or crystallisation, and transitions related to molecular mobility, such as glass transition (Loverday et al, 2009). …”
Section: Sensory Instrumental and Microbiological Characterisation mentioning
confidence: 99%