2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical control of durum wheat grain filling and glutenin polymer assembly under different temperature regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other results suggested that the end of grain filling could rather be caused by steric hindrance in the endosperm due to the accumulation of starch granules. This hypothesis is supported by the many reports showing that the end of grain filling occurs at a critical grain water concentration ( Ellis and Pieta Filho, 1992 ; Calderini et al, 2000 ; Borras et al, 2004 ; Borrás and Gambín, 2010 ; Ferreira et al, 2012 ). For wheat this water concentration is close to 46%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other results suggested that the end of grain filling could rather be caused by steric hindrance in the endosperm due to the accumulation of starch granules. This hypothesis is supported by the many reports showing that the end of grain filling occurs at a critical grain water concentration ( Ellis and Pieta Filho, 1992 ; Calderini et al, 2000 ; Borras et al, 2004 ; Borrás and Gambín, 2010 ; Ferreira et al, 2012 ). For wheat this water concentration is close to 46%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Weaker dough from grains that experience one or several days of very high temperature have been related to a marked decrease in the proportion of large molecular size glutenin polymers (ciaffi et al, 1996;corbellini et al, 1998;Wardlaw et al, 2002;don et al, 2005). The aggregation of glutenin proteins, which occurs mainly during grain desiccation after physiological maturity (carceller and aussenac, 2001;Ferreira et al, 2012), is likely the major process responsible for heat-shock-related dough weakening. extended periods of high temperature are common in many cereal-growing areas of the world, and above-optimal temperature is one of the major factors affecting small grain cereal yield and composition (randall and Moss, 1990;Borghi et al, 1995;Graybosch et al, 1995).…”
Section: Fig 174mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that very high temperature around mid-grain filling has positive effects on wheat dough strength (Stone et al, 1997;panozzo and eagles, 2000), whereas very high temperature around physiological maturity has a negative effect on dough strength (randall and Moss, 1990;Blumenthal et al, 1991;Stone and nicolas, 1996). This difference in the response of dough properties according to the timing of heat-shock are related to different effects on the gliadin-to-glutenin ratio and the size of glutenin polymers at each developmental stage (Ferreira et al, 2012). Further experiments to identify the relative sensitivity of different development stages in terms of gliadin and glutenin accumulation and glutenin polymer formation are clearly required.…”
Section: Fig 174mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective grain-filling phase follows when storage compounds, mainly starch and proteins, rapidly accumulate (Shewry et al, 2012 ). The rate of accumulation of starch and proteins slows down at around 550°Cd (27 days) after anthesis, when endosperm nuclei and protein bodies become compressed by starch granules (Hoshikawa, 1962 ; Ferreira et al, 2012 ) and progressively disintegrate. Accumulation stops at 650–700°Cd (32–35 days) after anthesis when the concentration of water in grain is close to 45 g per 100 g of fresh mass (Schnyder and Baum, 1992 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%