2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iedm19574.2021.9720696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics and Innovative Technologies in SiC Power Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6] Just like Si MOSFETs, numerous studies link the electrical characteristic changes of the devices before and after irradiation to the radiation-induced interface traps and oxide traps. [7][8][9][10] Meanwhile, since 4H-SiC MOS-FETs have long suffered from poor interface quality, [11][12][13] nitric oxide (NO) or nitrous oxide (N 2 O) post-annealing has been utilized in the production of commercial 4H-SiC MOS-FETs to suppress the interface trap density. [14][15][16] However, many studies suggest that interface nitridation not only passivates the intrinsic defects but also introduces additional interface and/or near-interface oxide traps as well, [17] making the trapping mechanism in 4H-SiC MOSFETs more complex and significantly different from that of Si MOSFETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Just like Si MOSFETs, numerous studies link the electrical characteristic changes of the devices before and after irradiation to the radiation-induced interface traps and oxide traps. [7][8][9][10] Meanwhile, since 4H-SiC MOS-FETs have long suffered from poor interface quality, [11][12][13] nitric oxide (NO) or nitrous oxide (N 2 O) post-annealing has been utilized in the production of commercial 4H-SiC MOS-FETs to suppress the interface trap density. [14][15][16] However, many studies suggest that interface nitridation not only passivates the intrinsic defects but also introduces additional interface and/or near-interface oxide traps as well, [17] making the trapping mechanism in 4H-SiC MOSFETs more complex and significantly different from that of Si MOSFETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in this study, the channel was formed on 1100 ( ¯)-face which inversion electron flowed along [0001] and electron mobility was enhanced by tensile stress opposite to the results of the former investigations. [20][21][22] However, it was reported that 4H-SiC has anisotropy of some electrical characteristics such as Hall electron mobility 35) and impact ionization coefficient for electrons [36][37][38] due to its unique and unclear conduction band structure 39) and the anisotropy depends on the direction of electron flow. Therefore, it can be thought that the result of this study implies that the relationship between stress and electron mobility also has anisotropy which depends on the direction of channel and inversion electron flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicon carbide (SiC) single crystal materials, as third-generation semiconductor materials, have larger bandgap widths, higher critical breakdown electric field strengths, better thermal conductivity, high saturated electron migration rates, good voltage withstanding ability, and extremely low conduction energy losses [1,2]. The bandgap width of SiC can reach 3.2 eV, three times that of Si [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%