2020
DOI: 10.1038/s42254-020-0208-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics for neuromorphic computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
337
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 673 publications
(410 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
337
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to conventional silicon-based CMOS chips, an alternate approach to neuro-inspired hardware has been driven by the development of novel non-CMOS nanoelectronic memory devices [11]. Of these, those exhibiting resistive switching memory are especially promising for nextgeneration neuromorphic systems, offering a considerably reduced area and energy cost of emulating neurons and synapses, compared to silicon-CMOS-based approaches [12][13][14][15]. Resistive switching nanoelectronic devices were first proposed as a new class of non-volatile memory [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to conventional silicon-based CMOS chips, an alternate approach to neuro-inspired hardware has been driven by the development of novel non-CMOS nanoelectronic memory devices [11]. Of these, those exhibiting resistive switching memory are especially promising for nextgeneration neuromorphic systems, offering a considerably reduced area and energy cost of emulating neurons and synapses, compared to silicon-CMOS-based approaches [12][13][14][15]. Resistive switching nanoelectronic devices were first proposed as a new class of non-volatile memory [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is hardware compatible as LIF neurons, leaky integrators, delays, and low pass filters are circuit elements that can be efficiently implemented in Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) technology ( Mead and Ismail, 1989 ), and bidirectional synapses could be implemented with CMOS compatible emergent nano-devices such as memristors ( Ishii et al, 2019 ; Marković et al, 2020 ; Wan et al, 2020 ). The corresponding pseudocode is given in Algorithm 1 (see supplemental information for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EqSpike could also be sped up by building on dedicated hardware in analog or digital CMOS ( Schemmel et al, 2010 ; Qiao et al, 2015 ; Thakur et al, 2018 ; Frenkel et al, 2019 ; Park et al., 2020 ). Emerging nanotechnologies such as memristive synapses and nanoscale spiking oscillators are compelling candidates to scale up neuromorphic hardware due to their small size, their speed, and their low energy consumption ( Marković et al, 2020 ; Milo et al, 2020 ; Sebastian et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Xi et al, 2020 ). These technologies are typically prone to imperfections such as the device-to-device variability, cycle-to-cycle variability, or the non-linearity in the conductance-to-voltage response, which are known to considerably jeopardize learning in memristive neural networks ( Ishii et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are about 10 11 neurons and 10 15 synapses, and thus it is important to implement neurons and synapses with high density in order to mimic the brain in hardware. 7,8 Neurons are mainly composed of CMOS-based circuits, while synapses primarily comprise memristors. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, circuit-based neurons are problematic for high packing density with low-cost because they are composed of a capacitor, integrator, and comparator including many transistors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%