2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-informed machine learning model for computational fracture of quasi-brittle materials without labelled data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training process was manually terminated after identifying an interpretable and highly accurate individual. The operators ' + ' , ' -' , ' × ' , ' / ' , 'ln_abs() ' (24)…”
Section: Domain Knowledge-guidedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The training process was manually terminated after identifying an interpretable and highly accurate individual. The operators ' + ' , ' -' , ' × ' , ' / ' , 'ln_abs() ' (24)…”
Section: Domain Knowledge-guidedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) has powerful nonlinear processing and multivariate learning capabilities. It has been widely used for crack growth to solve complex nonlinear prediction problems [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed, the radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN), backpropagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), fully connected neural network, random forest (RF), hidden Markov model (HMM), and long short-term memory (LSTM) all yield accurate life and crack growth predictions [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean function m(x) is set to be 0 for convenience. The kernel function is chosen as the squared exponential kernel, (17…”
Section: Bayesian Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sufficient well-labelled data are usually expensive in many scenarios, especially for the high-fidelity fracture predictions [15,16]. Moreover, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently been implemented to overcome the low data availability [17]. PINNs assimilate physical governing equations into loss functions, which means PINNs are trained to satisfy the given training data as well as the imposed governing equations [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of solving the PDEs directly, the DEM regards the potential energy of the system expressed in the local form based on classical continuum mechanics as the loss function, which has derivatives of a lower order compared to the strong form. Further, a length scale parameter in phase field is introduced to control the finite width of process zone and the fracture energy is considered in the loss function for fracture mechanical problems 52,53 . Nevertheless, additional variables and equations are introduced to represent the crack topology and mesh refinement is required at the vicinity of crack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%