2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.24.072802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics model-informed Gaussian process for online optimization of particle accelerators

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this is an initial implementation of this algorithm tested during SECAR commissioning operations, several improvements are being explored. For instance, the extensive database of accelerator historical data as well as physics simulations of SECAR and the accelerator may be used in implementing physics-informed optimizations of incoming beam parameters [20]. Additionally, beam specific priors can be developed by establishing a relationship between beam species, beam rigidity, and the GP kernel hyperparameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this is an initial implementation of this algorithm tested during SECAR commissioning operations, several improvements are being explored. For instance, the extensive database of accelerator historical data as well as physics simulations of SECAR and the accelerator may be used in implementing physics-informed optimizations of incoming beam parameters [20]. Additionally, beam specific priors can be developed by establishing a relationship between beam species, beam rigidity, and the GP kernel hyperparameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes these methods ideal for optimizing the accelerator incrementally during early commissioning. Information from physics simulations generated during the design process can also be used to help inform Bayesian optimization and speed up its convergence [48,49]. Data gathered during commissioning can then be used for automatic calibration of physics models to better match machine measurements and potentially identify early sources of systematic mis-match between the two that can be corrected either on the machine or in the physics simulation [50], as well as adapted over time to make model predictions more robust to time-varying sources of error [51].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (Ai/ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GP is a Bayesian nonparametric machine learning technique that provides a flexible prior distribution over functions, enjoys analytical tractability, defines kernels for encoding domain structure, and has a fully probabilistic workflow for principled uncertainty reasoning [26,27]. For these reasons GPs are used widely in scientific modeling, with several recent methods more directly encoding physics into GP models: Numerical GPs have covariance functions resulting from temporal discretization of time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) which describe the physics [28,29], modified Matérn GPs can be defined to represent the solution to stochastic partial differential equations [30] and extend to Riemannian manifolds to fit more complex geometries [31], and the physics-informed basis-function GP derives a GP kernel directly from the physical model [32] -the latter method we elucidate in an experiment optimization example in the surrogate modeling motif.…”
Section: Multi-physics and Multi-scale Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the online control of particle accelerators, Hanuka et al [32] develop the physics-informed basis-function GP.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation