2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01458-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics of multi-GEM structures

Abstract: We show that physics of multi-GEM structures is rather complex, regarding the number of phenomena affecting detector performance. The high-pressure operation in noble gases and the ion feedback are considered in more detail. It is proposed that the dominant avalanche mechanism in He and Ne, at high pressures, is the associative ionization. Ion feedback effects related to the dependence on gas, pressure and gain and to possible avalanche extension outside the GEM holes are discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, they would be frozen out at low temperatures. Also, this may speak in support of the hypothesis of associative ionization (the Hornbeck-Molnar process [12]) proposed recently in order to explain the unexpectedly low operation voltages and high gains observed in dense He [13].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, they would be frozen out at low temperatures. Also, this may speak in support of the hypothesis of associative ionization (the Hornbeck-Molnar process [12]) proposed recently in order to explain the unexpectedly low operation voltages and high gains observed in dense He [13].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A standard triple GEM detector prototype [18] has a drift gap, two transfer gaps and an induction gap of 3mm, 1mm, 2mm, and 1mm respectively as shown in fig. 2.…”
Section: Description Of Triple Gem Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we follow the approach described in Ref. [14]: the GEM hole is approximated by a parallel-plate counter with an electric field taken equal to that calculated in the center of the hole. The result is presented in Fig.13: the reduced ionization coefficient (i.e.…”
Section: Electron Avalanchingmentioning
confidence: 99%