2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologic Reactions After Proton Beam Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Significance of Urinary Autoactivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated the irradiated area by autoactivation imaging using positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the first day of PBT [ 41 ]. Autoactivation PET is suboptimal for evaluating irradiated dose or position in detail, thus we used this image for rough irradiated position confirmation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the irradiated area by autoactivation imaging using positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the first day of PBT [ 41 ]. Autoactivation PET is suboptimal for evaluating irradiated dose or position in detail, thus we used this image for rough irradiated position confirmation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have investigated whether AAPET is useful for treatment verification with proton beam therapy and Cion RT and they have concluded that AAPET verification is useful and reliable (28,29). However, owing to the large size of the instrumentation, current research with AAPET is mainly conducted with PET installed in a room separate from the irradiation room.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AAPET has the disadvantage of large instrument size; thus, it is difficult to install an AAPET device in the treatment room, requiring patients to be transported from the treatment room for the imaging. This generates a time lag between the C-ion irradiation and AAPET imaging, which allows transport of the activated elements with annihilation gammarays to unirradiated tissues via biofluids (29) and results in blurring of the obtained image. Therefore, it is not advisable to use AAPET for C-ion RT verification, unless the device is sufficiently downsized for in-room installation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we evaluated the target and GI tract by autoactivation imaging using positron emission tomography–CT. The data acquisition started 5 to 10 minutes after proton beam irradiation to assess the irradiated area on the first day of PBT [ 36 ]. Differences in the position or shape and total dose of the target or GI tract were evaluated by rigid fusion techniques using MIM Maestro.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%