2008
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and behavioral effects of social introduction on adult male rhesus macaques

Abstract: Pair housing of laboratory macaques is widely considered to lead to positive changes in well-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
64
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that levels of abnormal behavior decreased dramatically after pairing into full or intermittent contact among females but not among males. A previous study of adult male rhesus macaques found that significant reductions in abnormal behavior occurred soon after social introduction, but were no longer significant 5–9 months after introduction [Doyle et al, 2008]. Improvements in abnormal behavior may be relatively ephemeral in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to note that levels of abnormal behavior decreased dramatically after pairing into full or intermittent contact among females but not among males. A previous study of adult male rhesus macaques found that significant reductions in abnormal behavior occurred soon after social introduction, but were no longer significant 5–9 months after introduction [Doyle et al, 2008]. Improvements in abnormal behavior may be relatively ephemeral in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that socially housed rhesus macaques demonstrate well-being that is superior to that of their singly housed counterparts; pair-housed rhesus macaques display more affiliative interactions, physical activity, play, and exploration than singly housed individuals [Baker et al, 2012a; Eaton et al, 1994; Schapiro et al, 1996] and less abnormal, stereotyped, and self-injurious behavior [Baker et al, 2012a; Lutz et al, 2003; Novak, 2003; Schapiro et al, 1996]. Improved welfare as a result of social housing has been demonstrated in both female–female and male–male adult pairs [Baker et al, 2012a; Doyle et al, 2008; Eaton et al, 1994]. Pair and group housing may buffer stress for rhesus macaques as they are exposed to research events [Gilbert & Baker, 2011], removed from social groups [Gust et al, 1994], or transported to different facilities [Fernström et al, 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This population is heterogeneous on a number of factors that may influence the way individuals respond to social housing but the possible effects have not been measured. For example, prior research has demonstrated improved welfare in both female (Eaton et al, 1994) and male adult rhesus macaques (Doyle et al, 2008) when placed in isosexual pairs, but these studies vary in design so that effects of pair housing cannot be directly compared across sex. A more complete understanding of how the benefits of pair housing may differ between the sexes would be valuable because there remains a perception, unsupported by research findings, that males do not derive benefit from isosexual pair housing, if they can be paired at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most have not detected differences in cortisol measures or corticoadrenal functioning between macaques housed long term in single versus pair housing (e.g. Reinhardt et al, 1991a; Schapiro et al, 1993), but at least one study found cortisol levels were lower among adult male rhesus housed in compatible pairs compared to when they were housed singly (Doyle et al, 2008). The current study assesses serum cortisol levels to discern whether pair housing had a measurable effect on hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation