2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and biochemical responses of two spring wheat genotypes to non-hydraulic root-to-shoot signalling of partial and full root-zone drought stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) in plant leaves. These results were consistent with the observation by some other researchers [3, 22, 52]. Grain yield was substantially reduced in diploid wheat, briefly due to longer growth period of plants and more decomposition and compartmentalization of ABA in late growth period [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3) in plant leaves. These results were consistent with the observation by some other researchers [3, 22, 52]. Grain yield was substantially reduced in diploid wheat, briefly due to longer growth period of plants and more decomposition and compartmentalization of ABA in late growth period [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Plant root system can sense drying soil and send chemical signals to above-ground parts, closing the stomata and maintaining leaf water status [1, 2]. This phenomenon is involved in a series of eco-physiological and biochemical mechanisms to cope with drought stress in higher plants [3, 4]. According to root-to-shoot communication theory, root system can produce phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) and cytokinins (CKs), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, water transport is reduced, further sustaining the hydraulic signal along the root up to the shoot, where this decrease in water potential is perceived (reviewed in Rodrigues et al, 2019). However, several lines of evidence suggest that root-to-shoot signaling following stress still occurs when the water potential is maintained by watering parts of the roots or by adjusting the osmotic potential, thereby strongly suggesting the presence of nHRSCs (Davies and Zhang, 1991;Nonami et al, 1997;Tang and Boyer, 2002;Parent et al, 2010;Bonhomme et al, 2012;Batool et al, 2019a;Batool et al, 2019b). The current view is that the earliest response to mild osmotic stress is dominated by nHRSCs, whereas the longer-term response, or when the stress is more severe, is sustained by hydraulic signals (Schachtman and Goodger, 2008;Pérez-Alfocea et al, 2011;Batool et al, 2019a;Batool et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Root-to-shoot-transported Molecules Propagate the Signal Upwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants cope with drought deficit condition by recruiting drought avoidance and/or drought tolerance mechanisms, which include morphological, physiological, and molecular responses [2,3]. Water deficit condition negatively affects several aspects of plant physiology [4]. For instance, it uncouples photosynthesis, disorders the structure of enzymes, reduces nutrient uptake and/or transport to the shoot, therefore prompting a hormonal and nutritional imbalance in the plant [5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%