2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological effects of plastic particles on mussels are mediated by food presence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paul-Pont et al [20] recommend to consider realistic ecosystem scenarios when designing experiments to assess the effects of exposure to microplastics on marine organisms. Exposure concentrations of microplastics chosen were realistic levels (in C1), similar to those we can find in the environment [20], and higher doses to which mussels could be further exposed (C2 and C3), in accordance with experiments performed by Lu et al [61] in zebrafish (Danio rerio), and Wang et al [35] in mussel (M. curuscus). Experimental treatments were control or C0 (no microplastics), group 1 or C1 (0.02 mg/L of microbeads), group 2 or C2 (0.2 mg/L), and group 3 or C3 (2 mg/L).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paul-Pont et al [20] recommend to consider realistic ecosystem scenarios when designing experiments to assess the effects of exposure to microplastics on marine organisms. Exposure concentrations of microplastics chosen were realistic levels (in C1), similar to those we can find in the environment [20], and higher doses to which mussels could be further exposed (C2 and C3), in accordance with experiments performed by Lu et al [61] in zebrafish (Danio rerio), and Wang et al [35] in mussel (M. curuscus). Experimental treatments were control or C0 (no microplastics), group 1 or C1 (0.02 mg/L of microbeads), group 2 or C2 (0.2 mg/L), and group 3 or C3 (2 mg/L).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Detrimental effects in terms of ecotoxicological and inflammatory responses have been reported for this genus [ 33 , 34 ]. As an example, effects on energy budget, enzymes, and oxidative responses have been described in Mytilus coruscus after two weeks of exposure to polyethylene microspheres [ 35 ], as well as an increase in hemocyte mortality and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in Mytilus spp. after 96 h exposure [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes fishes and mussels are collected from the sea and kept alive to study how they interact with MPs. In these cases, they can be held in fiber-glass tanks with artificial seawater to acclimatize to laboratory conditions, and then microalgae or shrimps are added to feed the animals [ 116 , 117 ].…”
Section: Microplastic Transport In the Food Web And Consequent Human Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zooplanktonlar, mercan resifleri, midyeler, yumuşakçalar, balıklar, penguenler, farklı deniz kuşları, deniz kaplumbağaları, köpekbalıkları ve hatta deniz memelileri gibi (Şekil 2.) farklı trofik düzeylerdeki canlılarda tespit edilen mikroplastik varlığı tüm dünya için endişe verici bir hal almıştır [21,36,[55][56][57][58][59][60]. Farklı trofik düzeydeki canlılarda yapılan çalışmalar, mikroplastiklerin beslenme davranışlarında farklılaşma, vücut ağırlığında azalma, bağırsaklarda yaralanma, iltihaplanma ve birikim, gelişim bozuklukları, üreme bozuklukları, oksidatif stres ve toksik etkilere neden olmakla birlikte av-avcı ilişkisini etkileme potansiyeli gibi olumsuzluklara neden olduğunu göstermiştir [61].…”
Section: Ivdeni̇z Canlilarinda Mi̇kroplasti̇klerunclassified