2022
DOI: 10.1017/9781009043359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Influences of Music in Perception and Action

Abstract: This Element reviews literature on the physiological influences of music during perception and action. It outlines how acoustic features of music influence physiological responses during passive listening, with an emphasis on comparisons of analytical approaches. It then considers specific behavioural contexts in which physiological responses to music impact perception and performance. First, it describes physiological responses to music that evoke an emotional reaction in listeners. Second, it delineates how … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future directions may address distinctions between unidirectional coupling of individual practice with a recording (common in musicians' play-along practice albums) and bidirectional coupling that arises in joint performance. Physiological changes that occur during ensemble performance conditions, such as joint influences on respiration or heart rate, may also impact partners' coupling (Wright et al, 2022;Høffding et al, 2023). Finally, further investigations may compare influences of solo practice on joint synchronization in terms of frequency of practice (such as performers who practice music daily and those who do not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future directions may address distinctions between unidirectional coupling of individual practice with a recording (common in musicians' play-along practice albums) and bidirectional coupling that arises in joint performance. Physiological changes that occur during ensemble performance conditions, such as joint influences on respiration or heart rate, may also impact partners' coupling (Wright et al, 2022;Høffding et al, 2023). Finally, further investigations may compare influences of solo practice on joint synchronization in terms of frequency of practice (such as performers who practice music daily and those who do not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results link prenatal musical exposure to F 0 neural encoding, but do not provide any causal explanation nor detail on the most relevant constituents of musical exposure. For instance, the type of music that the mother and the fetus are exposed to, and its intensity, are both important factors in determining the impact of the exposure on speech encoding abilities and their general well‐being (Gerhardt & Abrams, 2000; Wright et al., 2022). Musical features such as tempo, meter, melodic frequency range, musical notes, syllabic contour and presence or absence of singing differ across music genres (Teie, 2016), and are based on acoustic features (i.e., pitch, intensity, timing…) that are readily available to the fetus despite the low‐pass filter characteristics of the womb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of studies has focused on physiological changes that music can induce in listeners (Wright, Bégel, & Palmer, 2022). The strong coupling between emotional responses to music and physiological processes is also present in aesthetic experiences of 'being moved' (Menninghaus et al, 2015), which are often linked to sympathetic physical phenomena such as chills ('goose bumps'), or to tears when listening to sad songs (Mori & Iwanaga, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%