2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12298-016-0399-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological performance of two contrasting rice varieties under water stress

Abstract: Two rice varieties PR-115 and Super-7 were imposed to water stress and different physiological traits were monitored to evaluate the performance of these varieties under drought. Under water stress condition although the relative water content, osmotic potential, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis rate, carbon discrimination and biomass decreased in both the varieties however, the reduction was more pronounced in Super-7 variety. Oryzanol a trans-ester of ferulic acid functions as antioxidant and it increased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significance, by analysis of variance Variety (V) P < 0.001 P < 0.01 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Water (W) P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.01 Year (Y) P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 Variety × water P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Variety × year P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Water × year P < 0.001 P < 0.01 NS 0.05 P < 0.01 V × W × Y P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 pigment rice varieties comparing with continuous flooding. The 10-day interval water stress condition after transplanting affected to increase anthocyanin both in drought tolerant and sensitive varieties (Khan et al, 2017). A similar response was reported by Rayee et al (2018) reporting that anthocyanin in japonica and indica rice varieties greatly enhanced by the 3-day interval of water deficit after anthesis to harvest.…”
Section: Zn Fe Yieldsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Significance, by analysis of variance Variety (V) P < 0.001 P < 0.01 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Water (W) P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.01 Year (Y) P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 Variety × water P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Variety × year P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 Water × year P < 0.001 P < 0.01 NS 0.05 P < 0.01 V × W × Y P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 pigment rice varieties comparing with continuous flooding. The 10-day interval water stress condition after transplanting affected to increase anthocyanin both in drought tolerant and sensitive varieties (Khan et al, 2017). A similar response was reported by Rayee et al (2018) reporting that anthocyanin in japonica and indica rice varieties greatly enhanced by the 3-day interval of water deficit after anthesis to harvest.…”
Section: Zn Fe Yieldsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, the understanding of the drought tolerance mechanism(s) that operate in grain amaranth remains limited. Natural variations in WDS tolerance are common in plants, as established by copious information describing differences between natural accessions, wild populations and domesticated C3 plants, including rice [16,17,18], C3 and C4 grasses [19], different C4 subtypes [20,21], or contrasting genotypes of commercially important C3 and C4 crops [5,22,23]. Based on this evidence, and considering their different geographic origin and preferential adaptation to temperate or tropical conditions, it was hypothesized that WDS tolerance in grain amaranths and A. hybridus , their shared ancestor, would vary significantly between species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of free proline was determined as the described method by Bates et al, 1973 in. The malondialdehyde (MDA) was extracted by a previous method (Hodges et al, 1999), and separately measured at 450, 532, and 600 nm and calculated by a formula of C (μ mol g -1 FW ) = [6.45 × (OD 532 - OD 660 ) - 0.56 × OD 450 ]/(FW × 1000) (Khan et al, 2017). The osmotic potentials of leaves were measured using an osmotic pressure dew point meter (Wescor 5520, Logan, UT, United States) by a formula of Ψ s (MPa) = -C i × 0.008314 × (273+T) × 10 -3 , where C i means instrument reading and T represents environment temperature (Ball and Oosterhuis, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%