2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42448-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological stress levels in wild koala sub-populations facing anthropogenic induced environmental trauma and disease

Abstract: Australian small mammals such as koalas must cope with immense pressure from anthropogenic induced stressors or trauma such as bushfires, vehicle collision impacts and habitat disturbance and land clearance. In addition, they must cope with diseases such as chlamydia. To date, there is no published literature on physiological stress levels in wild koala populations compared with identified environmental stressors. This study investigated physiological stress levels within sub-populations of wild koalas encount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of baseline, when referring to glucocorticoid values, has been given different meaning depending on the type of research and the intent of the researchers [41,56,57], and in many cases refers to a point-in-time value [39][40][41] using a limited number of animals. Admittedly, the main intent of most of these studies was to physiologically validate EIAs before and after an ACTH challenge; however, some authors compare obtained FCM values to those of 'stressed' animals [41,58,59] without taking into consideration the physiological changes due to period of day, sex and season. Other year-long studies on marsupials were carried out on numbats and wombats also in captivity [38,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of baseline, when referring to glucocorticoid values, has been given different meaning depending on the type of research and the intent of the researchers [41,56,57], and in many cases refers to a point-in-time value [39][40][41] using a limited number of animals. Admittedly, the main intent of most of these studies was to physiologically validate EIAs before and after an ACTH challenge; however, some authors compare obtained FCM values to those of 'stressed' animals [41,58,59] without taking into consideration the physiological changes due to period of day, sex and season. Other year-long studies on marsupials were carried out on numbats and wombats also in captivity [38,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike natural predators, which are more successful in killing animals in poorer condition, vehicles remove individuals from a population without regard to their condition or health (Bujoczek et al, 2011). Even non-lethal collisions can have a negative impact on animals via increases in glucocorticoid production (Narayan, 2019). Taken together, the direct and indirect effects of colobus-vehicle collisions could lead to suboptimal population health that would 275 contribute to reduced persistence of roadside groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary examples of indirect harms that culminate in wild bird mortalities include the impact of wind turbines (“wind farms”), communication towers and solar arrays [ 22 ]. Beyond harms that cause mortalities, there have also been vast improvements in understanding how wild animals are affected by non-lethal interactions with anthropogenic stressors like artificial light and sound (e.g., non-lethal stress in peri-urban wildlife [ 23 ]). These non-lethal effects also constitute harms.…”
Section: Animal Harmsmentioning
confidence: 99%