2006
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling 2: Predicting the tissue distribution of acids, very weak bases, neutrals and zwitterions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
833
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 820 publications
(847 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(89 reference statements)
13
833
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The organ‐to‐plasma partition coefficients were determined using drug physicochemical properties based on methods described by Rodgers et al 20. and Rodgers and Rowland 20, 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organ‐to‐plasma partition coefficients were determined using drug physicochemical properties based on methods described by Rodgers et al 20. and Rodgers and Rowland 20, 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of distribution at steady state was calculated by the tissue partition coefficient using the equation described by the Rodgers et al 17, 18. and the Rodgers & Rowland19, 20 methods considering the rapid equilibrium between blood and tissues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, the physiological parameters required to calculate the tissue‐to‐plasma partition coefficients by the PK‐Sim standard method1, 2 and the method by Rodgers et al 3. and Rogers and Rowland4 were identified from the literature sources. The literature search was performed using PubMed and/or Google Scholar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1, 1, 2, 3, 4,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 summarizes all processes and input parameters relevant for the PBPK models of the six test compounds. A more detailed description of the test compounds and the respective PBPK models can be found in the Supplementary Section SI .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation