1976
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force

Abstract: 1. The response to static tilts was studied in peripheral otolith neurons in the barbiturate-anesthetized squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Each unit was characterized by a functional polarization vector, which defines the axis of greatest sensitivity. A circumstantial criterion was used to assign units to the inferior (IN) or superior (SN) vestibular nerves. The former neurons should innervate the sacculus, the latter mainly the utriculus. Confirming pasting experiments, the polarization vectors for SN unit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
328
4
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
328
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4, net accel traces). As shown previously (Fernandez and Goldberg, 1976;Angelaki and Dickman, 2000;Angelaki et al, 2004), primary otolith afferents encode the net gravitoinertial acceleration, modulating similarly during translation or tilt, and transmit no motion information during the tilt minus translation condition. This was also the case for some thalamic cells (e.g., cell 1).…”
Section: Response Properties During Combinations Of Tilt and Translationsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, net accel traces). As shown previously (Fernandez and Goldberg, 1976;Angelaki and Dickman, 2000;Angelaki et al, 2004), primary otolith afferents encode the net gravitoinertial acceleration, modulating similarly during translation or tilt, and transmit no motion information during the tilt minus translation condition. This was also the case for some thalamic cells (e.g., cell 1).…”
Section: Response Properties During Combinations Of Tilt and Translationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…One of the cells (1) modulated similarly during the translation and tilt stimuli (note that the amplitude of the two movements was adjusted such that the components of linear acceleration along the interaural axis were identical) (see Materials and Methods). Thus, this cell's response could be explained by selective activation of otolith afferents, which have been shown to encode net linear acceleration regardless of whether the stimulus arises from actual translation or tilt relative to gravity (Fernandez and Goldberg, 1976;Angelaki et al, 2004). In contrast, cell 2 responded very differently during the translation and tilt stimuli.…”
Section: Response Properties During Horizontal Plane Translationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, how does the heading sensitivity of otolith afferents compare with central vestibular neurons? Are central vestibular neurons more sensitive than afferents because they have greater average modulation amplitudes than afferents (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), or do changes in response variability counteract these differences in response gain? Second, do otolith afferents show choice-related activity, and how do CPs of afferents compare with CPs measured in central neurons and cortical areas?…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medial area of the utricle is larger than the lateral area in humans (Rosenhall 1972) and three quarters of the neurons respond preferentially to ipsilateral tilt in monkeys (Fernandez and Goldberg 1976). Transient linear motion produces a linear VOR (LVOR) which is commonly asymmetric at high accelerations in healthy humans (Lempert et al 1998;Crane et al 2003) and more asymmetric after an acute unilateral vestibular lesion, although symmetry returns to the normal range over time (Lempert et al 1998).…”
Section: Perceptual Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%