2004
DOI: 10.3354/meps277037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton productivity on the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
218
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
218
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical and geochemical oceanography of this region is well documented (Carmack & Macdonald 2002), and several reports exist concerning the upper trophic levels (Dickson & Gilchrist 2002, Harwood & Smith 2002, Stirling 2002. Many studies have examined the phytoplankton and zooplankton (Carmack et al 2004 and references therein), but few have considered microbial communities and processes, and this lack of microbiological information has been identified as a major gap in understanding the structure and dynamics of this coastal arctic ecosystem (Amon 2004). Early studies of the microbiota were conducted in the western Beaufort Sea, at nearshore sites off Alaska, and were based on observations of bacterial isolates brought into culture (Kaneko et al 1977(Kaneko et al , 1978a.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physical and geochemical oceanography of this region is well documented (Carmack & Macdonald 2002), and several reports exist concerning the upper trophic levels (Dickson & Gilchrist 2002, Harwood & Smith 2002, Stirling 2002. Many studies have examined the phytoplankton and zooplankton (Carmack et al 2004 and references therein), but few have considered microbial communities and processes, and this lack of microbiological information has been identified as a major gap in understanding the structure and dynamics of this coastal arctic ecosystem (Amon 2004). Early studies of the microbiota were conducted in the western Beaufort Sea, at nearshore sites off Alaska, and were based on observations of bacterial isolates brought into culture (Kaneko et al 1977(Kaneko et al , 1978a.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the western Canadian Arctic, the Mackenzie River discharges large quantities of freshwater, solutes and sediments into a vast shelf region of the Beaufort Sea that extends >100 km offshore and encompasses a total area of 63 600 km 2 (Carmack et al 2004). The annual discharge of the Mackenzie River (330 km 3 yr -1 ; Macdonald et al 1998) is the 4th highest in the Arctic Basin after the Siberian rivers Yenisei, Lena and Ob, with concomitantly large inputs of freshwater biota, terrestrial nutrients, organic carbon and suspended sediment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships between PAR (E; estimated with a Biospherical QSL-2101 light sensor) and the uptake of C and N by phytoplankton from the SCM were assessed in four, ten-position light-gradient incubators designed to minimize spectral shift and accurately resolve photosynthetic parameters, especially in oligotrophic waters (Babin et al, 1994). Full-spectrum, 400-W Optimarc metal-halide lamps mimicking solar irradiance were used in combination with a blue filter (118 Light Blue Lee Filters Ltd.) and optically neutral filters (Lee Filters) to simulate the coastal underwater light spectrum (Hill and Cota, 2005;Carmack et al, 2004;Harrison et al, 1977). Actual PAR values in the incubators were kept in the low range to reproduce conditions near the SCM (from 664.2 to 0.3 µmol quanta −1 m −2 s −1 in 2005, with 6 of the 10 light intensities below 100 µmol quanta m −2 s −1 and from 309.1 to 1.8 µmol quanta −1 m −2 s −1 in 2006, 358.0 to 3.0 µmol quanta −1 m −2 s −1 in 2007 and 281.0 to 1.8 µmol quanta −1 m −2 s −1 in 2008, with 8 or 9 of the 10 light intensities below 100 µmol quanta m −2 s −1 ).…”
Section: Incubationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There it mixes with the outXow of the Mackenzie River, which generally also Xows eastward and spreads out across the Mackenzie Shelf (also called the Canadian Shelf). Between roughly mid-May to November, freshwater Xow from the river-the Mackenzie plume-dominates the Xow over the Mackenzie Shelf in a highly turbid surface layer about 5 m thick that overlays a brackish mixed layer from ice melt that extends to about 10-15 m (Carmack et al 2004). The plume predominantly Xows eastward into the Amundsen Gulf; its westward extent is unknown (Dunton et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%