1993
DOI: 10.30843/nzpp.1993.46.11196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytotoxicity to kiwifruit of oil sprayed after flowering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P<0.01 and P<0.001 for reddening and specking respectively. The higher level of fruit speckling recorded on the vines treated with 1 and 2% oil than that recorded with the same treatments by (McKenna and Steven 1993) is probably due to the accidental inclusion of the sticker.…”
Section: Phytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…P<0.01 and P<0.001 for reddening and specking respectively. The higher level of fruit speckling recorded on the vines treated with 1 and 2% oil than that recorded with the same treatments by (McKenna and Steven 1993) is probably due to the accidental inclusion of the sticker.…”
Section: Phytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These include the use of higher than normal water rates and the timing of oil applications. In particular, oils do not have a label claim for use from 10 days after flowering until February 1 due to the risk of phytotoxicity as indicated in this trial, and confirmed by more detailed investigations (McKenna and Steven 1993). Treatments were replicated six times in a completely randomised block design using single vine plots buffered by unsprayed vines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary concern in the use of oils on fruit crops is their potential for phytotoxicity. While pest control is likely to be improved by applying higher rates of oil, this increases the risk of damage to fruit (McKenna and Steven 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%