2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40998-019-00180-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PI, PD and PID Controllers Using Single DVCCTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve this problem, the fuzzy PI control method is employed. It is also possible to use PID for steering angle tracking control, but its parameter adjustment is more complex than PI control [41,42]. From the previous test, PI control was sufficient for steering angle tracking control.…”
Section: Off-center Arm Steering Angle Tracking Error Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, the fuzzy PI control method is employed. It is also possible to use PID for steering angle tracking control, but its parameter adjustment is more complex than PI control [41,42]. From the previous test, PI control was sufficient for steering angle tracking control.…”
Section: Off-center Arm Steering Angle Tracking Error Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature review reveals that the PID controller implementation includes a wide variety of designs based on the use of different active elements [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In [4], voltage-feedback operational amplifiers (OAs) are extensively used to implement conventional voltage-mode (VM) PID controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be the result of input noise injection. Also, a recent VM PID controller using a single active component was reported in [12], but its limitations are the same to those in [11]. Three DDCCs and five passive elements are used in the construction of VM PID controllers [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their wide range of applications have stimulated and sustained the design and invention of various PID controller circuits and sophisticated hardware modules. Over the last two decades, the enormous literature on PID process controllers has featured a wide range of design techniques based on numerous active compo-nents, such as operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs) [3], second generation current conveyors (CCIIs) [4]- [5], current feedback operational amplifiers (CFOAs) [6]- [9], current differencing buffered amplifiers (CDBAs) [10], differential voltage current conveyor transconductance amplifiers (DVCCTAs) [11], current follower transconductance amplifiers (CFTAs) [12]-13], voltage differencing transconductance amplifiers (VDTAs) [14], voltage differencing current conveyors (VDCCs) [15], and second generation voltage conveyors (VCIIs) [16]. In [3]- [4], [6], [9]- [10], the PID controllers designed with the signal-flow graph approach have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the realizations in [3]- [4], [9]- [10], [16], at least four active components were required. Furthermore, PID controller realizations of [4]- [6], [9]- [11], [13]- [15] include a number of passive components, i.e., at least five passive components, some of which are also floating. Floating passive components were used to design single active element-based PID controller circuits in [7]- [8], [12]- [13], [15]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%