2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picoliter Cell Lysate Assays in Microfluidic Droplet Compartments for Directed Enzyme Evolution

Abstract: We demonstrate the utility of a microfluidic platform in which water-in-oil droplet compartments serve to miniaturize cell lysate assays by a million-fold for directed enzyme evolution. Screening hydrolytic activities of a promiscuous sulfatase demonstrates that this extreme miniaturization to the single-cell level does not come at a high price in signal quality. Moreover, the quantitative readout delivers a level of precision previously limited to screening methodologies with restricted throughput. The sortin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
241
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
241
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also in line with the sorter error rate being on the order of 10 −4 indicating that it should not significantly affect the enrichment, which is more than ten times lower. A good agreement between η max and the actual enrichment was also reported by Fallah-Araghi et al 28 In contrast, Kintses et al (2012) 30 found an enrichment of ca. 1/20 of η max , likely due to the fact that their sorting experiment involved a library rather than a binary mixture of two strains, the library being a more difficult model system.…”
Section: Model Selection For α-Amylase Expressionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is also in line with the sorter error rate being on the order of 10 −4 indicating that it should not significantly affect the enrichment, which is more than ten times lower. A good agreement between η max and the actual enrichment was also reported by Fallah-Araghi et al 28 In contrast, Kintses et al (2012) 30 found an enrichment of ca. 1/20 of η max , likely due to the fact that their sorting experiment involved a library rather than a binary mixture of two strains, the library being a more difficult model system.…”
Section: Model Selection For α-Amylase Expressionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Droplet-based microfluidic screening provides a flexible platform for assaying enzyme activity over a broad range of reaction conditions (10)(11)(12)(13). We adapted our screening protocol to include a heat challenge and enriched for mutations that increase the enzyme's thermostability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through comprehensive mutagenesis and functional characterization of this enzyme, we were able, with minimal bias, to discover residues crucial to function and identify mutations that enhance its activity at elevated temperatures. This approach can be applied to any enzyme whose chemical activity can be measured with a fluorogenic assay in microfluidic droplets (10)(11)(12)(13). Our method extends the applicability of deep mutational scanning to a wide range of protein functions and reaction conditions not accessible by other high-throughput methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Single occupancy of cells in droplets can be controlled by the cell concentration and follows a Poisson distribution 24 . In the droplet, the two aqueous phases from the separate inlets are mixed, the cells are lysed 25 and the enzyme catalyst is liberated and thus able to react with substrate. The reaction is conducted in emulsion droplets at 30 °C with agarose in its liquid (sol) form (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to transient, fluid droplets in microfluidic devices, the compartmentalization is robustly 'immortalized' in GSBs. The stability of GSBs allows them to be handled and analyzed in aqueous solution by standard FACS equipment (rather than custom-made microfluidic on-chip emulsion sorters 25,[31][32][33][34] ). FACS can also be employed for cell-based selections, but they either rely on in vivo live/dead assays 35 or require that the reaction product must be captured in or on cells 36,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%