The Routledge International Handbook of Organizational Autoethnography 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780429056987-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pieced together. Writing invisible (dis)abilities in academia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the experiences of 66 disabled employees, we address a conspicuous lack of attention paid to disability within organizational WLB debates. Our findings confirm and further qualify the assertion that disabled people are more likely to experience WLB issues (Bourdeaud'hui & Vanderhaeghe, 2015) and contribute to debates on women's embodied struggles in the workplace (e.g., Gatrell, 2013;Meldgaard Kjaer & van Amsterdam, 2020). This study addresses the critique of the overreliance on gender as an important social identity in debates on WLB (Özbilgin et al, 2011) and the almost exclusive theorizing about the body by non-disabled feminists making it 'both incomplete and skewed toward healthy, non-disabled experience' (Erevelles, 2011;Wendell, 1996, p. 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Through the experiences of 66 disabled employees, we address a conspicuous lack of attention paid to disability within organizational WLB debates. Our findings confirm and further qualify the assertion that disabled people are more likely to experience WLB issues (Bourdeaud'hui & Vanderhaeghe, 2015) and contribute to debates on women's embodied struggles in the workplace (e.g., Gatrell, 2013;Meldgaard Kjaer & van Amsterdam, 2020). This study addresses the critique of the overreliance on gender as an important social identity in debates on WLB (Özbilgin et al, 2011) and the almost exclusive theorizing about the body by non-disabled feminists making it 'both incomplete and skewed toward healthy, non-disabled experience' (Erevelles, 2011;Wendell, 1996, p. 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, although disabled employees can in theory make use of both the WLB policies offered by their work organizations and assert their right to reasonable accommodations (Foster, 2007), our data illustrate a lack of engaging with such mechanisms, instead turning to self-initiated crafting techniques (Sturges, 2012) and relying on individual flexibilities to manage the difficulties of work and impairment (Foster, 2007;Meldgaard Kjaer & van Amsterdam, 2020;Williams & Mavin, 2015). In identifying the ways our participants prioritize self-initiated, unofficial techniques, we extend Sturges' (2012) WLB crafting framework by offering an embodied 'bodily crafting' perspective, which in our study took a number of forms: retaining all energy for work purposes, active body management throughout the workday and self-medicating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We met on Zoom, where we exchanged ideas and got to know each other better, since not all of us had worked together before. We all work on critical, intersectional, and transnational feminist and care perspectives, as a meaningful response to addressing social inequalities and vulnerabilities (Fotaki & Harding, 2018; Kjær & Van Amsterdam, 2020). We also address issues of embodiment, diversity, ethics, and relationality in our work (Fotaki & Prasad, 2015; Mandalaki & Fotaki, 2020; Mandalaki et al., 2021; van Amsterdam et al., 2021).…”
Section: The Process Through Our Voices Dialoguingmentioning
confidence: 99%