Piecewise adiabatic following in non-Hermitian cycling

Abstract

The time evolution of periodically driven non-Hermitian systems is in general non-unitary but can be stable. It is hence of considerable interest to examine the adiabatic following dynamics in periodically driven non-Hermitian systems. We show in this work the possibility of piecewise adiabatic following interrupted by hopping between instantaneous system eigenstates. This phenomenon is first observed in a computational model and then theoretically explained, using an exactly solvable model, in terms of the Stokes phenomenon. In the latter case, the piecewise adiabatic following is shown to be a genuine critical behavior and the precise phase boundary in the parameter space is located. Interestingly, the critical boundary for piecewise adiabatic following is found to be unrelated to the domain for exceptional points. To characterize the adiabatic following dynamics, we also advocate a simple definition of the Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase for non-unitary cyclic dynamics, which always yields real AA phases. In the slow driving limit, the AA phase reduces to the Berry phase if adiabatic following persists throughout the driving without hopping, but oscillates violently and does not approach any limit in cases of piecewise adiabatic following. This work exposes the rich features of non-unitary dynamics in cases of slow cycling and should stimulate future applications of non-unitary dynamics.

Dynamical quantum phase transitions in non-Hermitian lattices

“…One such class of open systems can be descried by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. This type of system, realizable in various platforms like photonic lattice [34], phononic media [35], LRC circuits [36] and cold atoms [37,38], has attracted great attention in recent years due to their nontrivial dynamical [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], topological [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and transport properties [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. Many of these features can be traced back to non-Hermitian degeneracy (i.e.…”

Non-Hermitian dynamics of slowly varying Hamiltonians

“…We have shown numerically that our theory accurately describes the phenomenon of "sudden transitions" in non-Hermitian dynamics, where the system state jumps from one non-Hermitian eigenstate to another [7,19,20,28,41,51,52]. This phenomenon has recently been shown to be useful for realizing efficient optical isolators [55].…”

Phase-dependent topological interface state and spatial adiabatic passage in a generalized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

“…The spatial profiles of the initial and final states in the top inset indicate that the SAP in this case maintains high efficiency. In non-Hermitian systems, there are in general limitations to the observation of adiabatic transport as, e.g., when state switching and piecewise adiabatic following occur [82][83][84][85][86]. Adiabatic passage of damped states is in our case unfeasible owing to the fact that, while these states vanish with time, nonadiabatic processes may populate other states undergoing amplification, as seen for instance in Ref.…”