2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecewise polynomial shape functions for hp-finite element methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shape functions for two‐dimensional 1‐irregular meshes are proposed by Gupta in 18, and for three dimensions by Morton et al 19. For general k ‐irregular meshes, Legendre‐type shape functions are proposed by Baitsch and Hartmann in 20 and Karniadakis and Sherwin 39. An approach by Cho et al 21, 22 constructs shape functions for non‐matching interface discretization which may also be understood as hanging nodes.…”
Section: Hanging Nodes With Dofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shape functions for two‐dimensional 1‐irregular meshes are proposed by Gupta in 18, and for three dimensions by Morton et al 19. For general k ‐irregular meshes, Legendre‐type shape functions are proposed by Baitsch and Hartmann in 20 and Karniadakis and Sherwin 39. An approach by Cho et al 21, 22 constructs shape functions for non‐matching interface discretization which may also be understood as hanging nodes.…”
Section: Hanging Nodes With Dofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches for obtaining conforming shape functions for hanging nodes are e.g. proposed in Baitsch and Hartmann 20 and Cho et al 21, 22. To the best of our knowledge, XFEM has so far not been used in the context of this approach where DOFs are present at the hanging nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of completeness, other approaches that can be used for local mesh refinement in conjunction with quadrilateral/hexahedral finite elements are briefly introduced in the following. Baitsch & Hartmann also developed a transition element based on piecewise polynomial shape functions [53]. This approach requires subdividing the refined element into a number of quadrilateral subdomains and consequently leads to a comparably large number of internal degrees of freedom within each macroelement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third approach consists of weakly imposing the conformity by means of penalty method, Lagrange multipliers, or Nitsche method. The fourth approach is to construct conforming shape functions for elements with hanging nodes and to introduce independent DOFs for the hanging nodes [72][73][74].Such local remeshing schemes have been integrated into the XFEM framework. By constrained approximation, Unger et al [10] developed an adaptive crack growth algorithm using XFEM; Fries et al [11] investigated two approaches, confirming shape functions and constrained approximation, for the handling of hanging nodes in the framework of XFEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third approach consists of weakly imposing the conformity by means of penalty method, Lagrange multipliers, or Nitsche method. The fourth approach is to construct conforming shape functions for elements with hanging nodes and to introduce independent DOFs for the hanging nodes [72][73][74].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%