2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92503-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piedra Museo, A Place and a History of the Peopling of Patagonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is no genetic or bioanthropological evidence associated with individuals from this early stage of human occupation, the Monte Verde site, dated to 14,500 cal yr BP (calibrated years before present) [38][39][40][41] in north-western Patagonia, would be a key evidence supporting this hypothesis [38,42], being the oldest record within the Southern Cone of South America (which encompasses presentday Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and southern Brazil). Archaeological evidence also suggests the presence of human populations in eastern Patagonia in the beginnings of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition (13,500 yr BP), probably in the early stages of occupation [43,44], considering the archaeological localities of Piedra Museo [45,46] and Cerro Tres Tetas [47] in the central Deseado Massif (Santa Cruz, Argentina) (Figure 1D). Further south, within the Magellan Basin, there are other early records of human activity in Cueva Lago Sofia [48], Cueva del Medio [49] and Cueva Fell [50], where fishtail projectile points and fires have been found dating up to 12,800 cal yr BP.…”
Section: First Stages Of Human Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is no genetic or bioanthropological evidence associated with individuals from this early stage of human occupation, the Monte Verde site, dated to 14,500 cal yr BP (calibrated years before present) [38][39][40][41] in north-western Patagonia, would be a key evidence supporting this hypothesis [38,42], being the oldest record within the Southern Cone of South America (which encompasses presentday Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and southern Brazil). Archaeological evidence also suggests the presence of human populations in eastern Patagonia in the beginnings of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition (13,500 yr BP), probably in the early stages of occupation [43,44], considering the archaeological localities of Piedra Museo [45,46] and Cerro Tres Tetas [47] in the central Deseado Massif (Santa Cruz, Argentina) (Figure 1D). Further south, within the Magellan Basin, there are other early records of human activity in Cueva Lago Sofia [48], Cueva del Medio [49] and Cueva Fell [50], where fishtail projectile points and fires have been found dating up to 12,800 cal yr BP.…”
Section: First Stages Of Human Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wild equids, including both ancestral members of the genus Equus as well as their donkey-like relatives, Hippidion, flourished in South America during the Pleistocene-the osteological remains of Ice Age horses were encountered by Darwin during his voyages on the HMS Beagle during the 19th century (2). Early migrants to the South American continent encountered and made use of wild equids, as evidenced by their appearance in archaeological sites (3,4). However, endogenous horses appear to have become extinct in the region sometime during the Late Pleistocene, with perhaps later persistence at higher latitudes and higher altitude zones (5).…”
Section: Dispersal Of Horses To South Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los sitios arqueológicos del Macizo del Deseado (Santa Cruz) que consideramos para este trabajo son: Cueva Maripe, Cueva 3 de Los Toldos, Cueva 7 de El Ceibo y Piedra Museo (Marchionni, 2013(Marchionni, , 2016Marchionni et al, 2022;Miotti, 1995Miotti, , 1998Miotti et al, 1999; mientras que, los sitios considerados de la meseta de Somuncurá (Río Negro), corresponden a los que integran el complejo de caza que en tiempos posthispánicos se conoce como Yamnagoo (Claraz, 1988;Moreno, s. f.). Dichos sitios incluyen entre los principales a Amigo Oeste (AW) y Toco Luan (Miotti et al, 2009(Miotti et al, , 2010Terranova, 2013, entre muchos) (Figura 2).…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified
“…En relación con este aspecto, también adquiere importancia la funcionalidad de cada sitio, ya que, las diferencias en los motivos rupestres entre sitios, pueden responder a las distintas formas en que humanos y animales se vinculan en cada paisaje particular. Así, por ejemplo, las diferencias que se observan entre la representación de motivos en Cueva Maripe y Los Toldos respecto de las de Piedra Museo y El Ceibo (Tabla 2) pueden responder a que los dos primeros corresponden a sitios de campamentos base (Marchionni, 2013;Miotti, 1998;, mientras que Piedra Museo y El Ceibo son interpretados, en primera instancia, como estaciones de caza (Marchionni, 2013;Miotti, 1995Miotti, , 1998Miotti & Salemme, 2005;Miotti et al, 1999.…”
Section: Reflexiones Finalesunclassified