2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9632-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piezo-Actuated Adaptive Prisms for Optical Scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have developed two optimized versions of a piezo-actuated adaptive fluid prism with an aperture of 8 mm using a suitable choice of the actuation concept, an improved design of the fluid chamber, and an FEM-based optimization of the details of the design. For the prism that was optimized for large tilt angles, we found maximum surface tilt angles of ± 12.3 • (± 6.1 • scan angle) with 75% response times of less than 2.5 ms compared to our previously published design with approximately ±2.6 • tilt angle and response times of 59 ms [21] or an electrowetting prism in the literature with scanning angles of ±6.4 • (discrete steps in the second dimension) and response times in the range of 400 ms [19]. Modern galvanometer scanner can achieve response times in the range of approximately 0.5 ms for a scanning range of 4 • [10], which was approximately the same angular range as measured in our step response measurement, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have developed two optimized versions of a piezo-actuated adaptive fluid prism with an aperture of 8 mm using a suitable choice of the actuation concept, an improved design of the fluid chamber, and an FEM-based optimization of the details of the design. For the prism that was optimized for large tilt angles, we found maximum surface tilt angles of ± 12.3 • (± 6.1 • scan angle) with 75% response times of less than 2.5 ms compared to our previously published design with approximately ±2.6 • tilt angle and response times of 59 ms [21] or an electrowetting prism in the literature with scanning angles of ±6.4 • (discrete steps in the second dimension) and response times in the range of 400 ms [19]. Modern galvanometer scanner can achieve response times in the range of approximately 0.5 ms for a scanning range of 4 • [10], which was approximately the same angular range as measured in our step response measurement, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…To define the bi-axial tilt angle of the top glass, we used three active beams. In figure 4, we show our initial mechanical design of [21] with the most important geometric dimensions in a full device overview (left) and a cross-section through the prism (right). Furthermore, we marked critical structures that restrict the deflection angle of the prism (circles).…”
Section: Device Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, only negative mirror angles are required for the application, which reduces the deflection range of the mirrors in the symmetric case by 50%. To overcome this problem, a pre-deflection can be defined by depolarizing the upper piezo sheet before gluing and finally re-polarizing the piezo material by applying an electric field higher than the coercive field strength of the material [19,20]. This creates a remanent strain in the piezo bimorphs which induces a pre-deflection of the mirrors in the negative direction.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Deflection Anglementioning
confidence: 99%