Pig and dog use in the pre‐contact Society Island Chiefdoms: integrated ethnohistoric, archaeological and use‐web analyses

Abstract

Pig and dog were highly valued animals in pre‐contact Polynesia. In this paper, I focus on pig and dog use in the resource rich, and hierarchically complex, pre‐contact Society Island chiefdoms. Utilizing ethnohistoric data and human‐centred use‐webs data, I provide a preliminary study of the diverse ways that pigs and dogs were used in pre‐contact Mā‘ohi life across 13 use categories. Ethnohistoric analyses indicate that pigs, and to some extent dogs, were intimately associated with elite ceremonial use, yet pigs were commonly associated with war and fertility rituals, while dogs were commonly associated with peacekeeping events. Preliminary comparison of pig and dog frequencies at eight excavated archaeological sites suggests pig bones far outnumber dog bones. There is also differential recovery of pig and dog bone in terms of site function and site status, with high status temples dating to the Centralization Phase having the highest incidence of both species. It is highly likely that the advent of the ‘Oro war cult led to intensified pig husbandry, given this animal's robust associations with ritual use, moral notions of chiefly power and cosmology. Why dog husbandry was less intensified in the Society Islands, and why this animal was perhaps accessed largely through long‐distance trade relationships, is an ongoing question.

People of the sea, or of the soil? How the balance of marine and terrestrial resource availability informs maximum population on four Polynesian islands

“…At the non-elite residential sites on Mo orea there is a general trend over time toward less mammal and more sh biomass in precontact cultural deposits; this re ects tapu restrictions in the later period which excluded commoners largely from eating pig and dog (Kahn 2024;Oliver 1974, 276). However, averaging across the period 1400-1800 among commoner sites we nd the biomass contribution of mammals was 37.8% and of n sh was 57.0%, with turtle contributing 4.5% and birds 0.8%.…”