Pilot study and design conceptualization for a slim single-port surgical manipulator with spring backbones and catheter-size channels

Ren, Hongliang; Chen, Cai Xin; Cai, Catherine Jiayi; Ramachandra, Krishna; Seenivasan, Lalithkumar

doi:10.1109/icinfa.2017.8078959

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From technical point of view, it is challenging to precisely manipulate and accurately position the catheter tip at the target tissue and meanwhile provide a stable contact force for a specific duration to the region of interest. To address these issues, technological innovation of advanced catheter tip is highly required for the future steerable catheter robots where hybrid integration technology can be leveraged to integrate flexible sensing [73], [74] and actuating [75][76][77] functional units into the catheter.…”

Section: Healthcare Roboticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the Special Section: Convergence of Automation Technology, Biomedical Engineering, and Health Informatics Toward the Healthcare 4.0

Pang

Yang

Khédri

et al. 2018

IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry 4.0 is spilling out from manufacturing to healthcare. In this article, we provide a brief history and key enabling technologies of Industry 4.0, and its revolution in healthcare-Healthcare 4.0-and its reshaping of the landscape of the entire healthcare value chain. We discuss the shift in the system design paradigm from open, small, and single loop to closed, large, and multiple loops. We provide the example of a Caregiving Home, and discuss emerging research topics and challenges, including healthcare big data, automated medical production, healthcare robotics, and human-robot symbiosis. Relevant papers published in this special section are also presented.

show abstract

Section: Healthcare Roboticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the Special Section: Convergence of Automation Technology, Biomedical Engineering, and Health Informatics Toward the Healthcare 4.0

Pang

Yang

Khédri

et al. 2018

IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Untethered Soft Ferromagnetic Quad-Jaws Cootie Catcher with Selectively Coupled Degrees of Freedom

Cai

Seenivasan

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Bioengineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background A variety of human computer interfaces are used by robotic surgical systems to control and actuate camera scopes during minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this review is to examine the different user interfaces used in both commercial systems and research prototypes. Methods A comprehensive scoping review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases to identify user interfaces used in commercial products and research prototypes of robotic surgical systems and robotic scope holders. Papers related to actuated scopes with human–computer interfaces were included. Several aspects of user interfaces for scope manipulation in commercial and research systems were reviewed. Results Scope assistance was classified into robotic surgical systems (for multiple port, single port, and natural orifice) and robotic scope holders (for rigid, articulated, and flexible endoscopes). Benefits and drawbacks of control by different user interfaces such as foot, hand, voice, head, eye, and tool tracking were outlined. In the review, it was observed that hand control, with its familiarity and intuitiveness, is the most used interface in commercially available systems. Control by foot, head tracking, and tool tracking are increasingly used to address limitations, such as interruptions to surgical workflow, caused by using a hand interface. Conclusion Integrating a combination of different user interfaces for scope manipulation may provide maximum benefit for the surgeons. However, smooth transition between interfaces might pose a challenge while combining controls.

show abstract

Pilot study and design conceptualization for a slim single-port surgical manipulator with spring backbones and catheter-size channels

Cited by 4 publications

References 15 publications

Introduction to the Special Section: Convergence of Automation Technology, Biomedical Engineering, and Health Informatics Toward the Healthcare 4.0

Introduction to the Special Section: Convergence of Automation Technology, Biomedical Engineering, and Health Informatics Toward the Healthcare 4.0

Untethered Soft Ferromagnetic Quad-Jaws Cootie Catcher with Selectively Coupled Degrees of Freedom

User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About