2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study of a program delivered within the regular service system in Germany: Effect of a short-term attachment-based intervention on maternal sensitivity in mothers at risk for child abuse and neglect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, low effect sizes comparing IG and CG point to quite effective standard care for mothers leading to small differences between IG and CG. Some programs published subgroup analysis showing that programs had differential effects and were especially effective with the high-risk mothers (Pillhofer et al, 2014; In press), lower risk mothers (Sierau et al, under review), and girls in terms of gender effects concerning the children (Sandner & Jungmann, In preparation). Thus, future meta-analyses should include subgroup analyses which was not possible with the current data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, low effect sizes comparing IG and CG point to quite effective standard care for mothers leading to small differences between IG and CG. Some programs published subgroup analysis showing that programs had differential effects and were especially effective with the high-risk mothers (Pillhofer et al, 2014; In press), lower risk mothers (Sierau et al, under review), and girls in terms of gender effects concerning the children (Sandner & Jungmann, In preparation). Thus, future meta-analyses should include subgroup analyses which was not possible with the current data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the data set at follow-up is not conclusive and may not be representative for all programs. Furthermore, the effects were inhomogeneous with a medium effect size for Good Start at follow-up (d ¼0.54) (Pillhofer et al, 2014) and a negative small to zero effect for "Nobody slips through the net" (d ¼ À0.16) (Sidor et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, some studies have revealed higher benefits for children from families with lower psychosocial resources, such as was found in the Nurse–Family Partnership program (Kitzman et al., ; Olds et al., ). For German‐speaking countries, which have their own specific cultural environments, early intervention structures, and policies (Benz & Sidor, ), the meta‐analysis of Taubner, Wolter, and Rabung () has revealed that especially the Ulm model showed significant effects on maternal sensitivity (Bovenschen et al., ; Pillhofer et al., ; Ziegenhain, Derksen, & Dreisörner, ). On the other hand, no effects on language development were found (Taubner et al., ).…”
Section: Early Interventions Promoting Maternal Sensitivity and Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some children from lower SES backgrounds also may struggle academically (Sirin, 2005) and therefore have difficulty retaining knowledge presented in school-based CSA prevention programs. Recent work has shown that a short-term attachment-based intervention designed to enhance maternal sensitivity was effective among families at high risk for child abuse, but did not perform better than a control group in families at moderate risk for child abuse (Pillhofer et al, 2015). One aim of the preset study was to examine whether geographic CSA risk markers, such as the amount of documented abuse in the community, are related to school-based education and prevention program effectiveness.…”
Section: Community-level Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%