2023
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piloting HealthScore: Feasibility and acceptability of a clinically integrated health coaching program for people living with cancer

Abstract: Background Cancer supportive care interventions often have limited generalizability, goal misalignment, and high costs. We developed and piloted a health coaching intervention, UNC HealthScore, in patients undergoing cancer treatment (http://clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04923997). We present feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcome data. Methods HealthScore is a six‐month, theory‐based, multicomponent intervention delivered through participant‐driven coaching sessions. For the pilot study, parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other health coaching interventions for cancer survivors have been longer in duration and included more sessions (e.g., 11 calls over 6 months; weekly for 6 months). 37 , 38 While this relatively low‐dose intervention (involving just three remotely delivered sessions with a health coach) produced promising effects, future research could expand the number of sessions, while still considering how technology may support scalability. Referring clinicians and patients reported informational needs during the referral and enrollment process; both groups noted they would benefit from more information about what to expect from the program and its specific components at its outset, suggesting that more provider training and supportive materials may be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other health coaching interventions for cancer survivors have been longer in duration and included more sessions (e.g., 11 calls over 6 months; weekly for 6 months). 37 , 38 While this relatively low‐dose intervention (involving just three remotely delivered sessions with a health coach) produced promising effects, future research could expand the number of sessions, while still considering how technology may support scalability. Referring clinicians and patients reported informational needs during the referral and enrollment process; both groups noted they would benefit from more information about what to expect from the program and its specific components at its outset, suggesting that more provider training and supportive materials may be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, both coaches and patients wanted more sessions to build rapport and enhance accountability and self‐management skills. Other health coaching interventions for cancer survivors have been longer in duration and included more sessions (e.g., 11 calls over 6 months; weekly for 6 months) 37,38 . While this relatively low‐dose intervention (involving just three remotely delivered sessions with a health coach) produced promising effects, future research could expand the number of sessions, while still considering how technology may support scalability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These digital health programs can improve global, physical, and mental health while providing support in an ambulatory setting for people with cancer in managing their disease, by enhancing patients' selfe cacy, as well as helping providers track and respond to patient-reported outcomes [6]. Further, digital cancer health coaching programs have also been found to improve physical and mental health scores ( [9], [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%