2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinch-off of liquid bridge during droplet coalescence under constrained condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Unlike a conventional liquid bridge between two infinite plates, 34 the state of the liquid bridge in Figure 4b is in a nonequilibrium condition, induced by both static asymmetric geometry and dynamic flow. The stability of the liquid bridge is dominated primarily by three forces, namely, surface tension force (correlated to the droplet shape upon coalescence [39][40][41][42] ), and geometrical constraint forces 33,34,43 from the nozzle (correlated to the nozzle size) and the reservoir (correlated to the reservoir size), in which the surface tension force promotes the pinch-off, while the two constraint forces inhibit the pinch-off. These forces govern the shape evolution of the liquid bridge and the droplet remanent volume after pinch-off, and they are intrinsically correlated to the multiple geometrical dimensions, including the nozzle size, the separation distance, and the reservoir size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Unlike a conventional liquid bridge between two infinite plates, 34 the state of the liquid bridge in Figure 4b is in a nonequilibrium condition, induced by both static asymmetric geometry and dynamic flow. The stability of the liquid bridge is dominated primarily by three forces, namely, surface tension force (correlated to the droplet shape upon coalescence [39][40][41][42] ), and geometrical constraint forces 33,34,43 from the nozzle (correlated to the nozzle size) and the reservoir (correlated to the reservoir size), in which the surface tension force promotes the pinch-off, while the two constraint forces inhibit the pinch-off. These forces govern the shape evolution of the liquid bridge and the droplet remanent volume after pinch-off, and they are intrinsically correlated to the multiple geometrical dimensions, including the nozzle size, the separation distance, and the reservoir size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental setups for coalescence can be distinguished into static drop contacts or dynamic drop collisions. In the static drop contact case, drops are produced and fixed on nozzles or lying on the top or next to each other where film drainage and liquid bridge can be observed in detail [121]. However, during extraction process, drop coalescence is a dynamic behavior influenced by droplet movement.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years, there has been a growing interest in investigating the interactive dynamics of droplet arrays in engineered devices for manipulating various chemical and biological processes (Anna 2016;Sánchez Barea, Lee & Kang 2019;Panigrahi et al 2021;. Furthermore, in industrial applications like ink-jet printing, surface coating and fuel injectors, frequent events of drop collision appear inevitable (Aarts et al 2005;Tang et al 2012;Peng et al 2018;Varma et al 2020). In oil-water segregation processes, for instance, the coalescence of water droplets is preferred for efficient sedimentation of the dispersed phase (Kavehpour 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%