2018
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinned distance problem, slicing measures, and local smoothing estimates

Abstract: We improve the Peres-Schlag result on pinned distances in sets of a given Hausdorff dimension. In particular, for Euclidean distances, with

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Y is a smooth surface of codimension k. As in the paper [10] by Grafakos, Palsson and the first two authors, for a compact subset E ⊂ R d , we define the (two-point) Φ-configuration set of E as Our goal is to find a threshold, s 0 = s 0 (Φ), such that if dim H (E) > s 0 then ∆ Φ (E) has nonempty interior. Similar questions have been studied in, or are accessible to the methods of, a number of works, e.g., [11,2,5,23,24,21]. (There is of course an extensive literature on the related Falconer distance problem [8], and its generalizations to configurations, where the question is what lower bound on dim H (E) ensures that ∆ Φ (E) has positive Lebesque measure [41,7,6,15].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Y is a smooth surface of codimension k. As in the paper [10] by Grafakos, Palsson and the first two authors, for a compact subset E ⊂ R d , we define the (two-point) Φ-configuration set of E as Our goal is to find a threshold, s 0 = s 0 (Φ), such that if dim H (E) > s 0 then ∆ Φ (E) has nonempty interior. Similar questions have been studied in, or are accessible to the methods of, a number of works, e.g., [11,2,5,23,24,21]. (There is of course an extensive literature on the related Falconer distance problem [8], and its generalizations to configurations, where the question is what lower bound on dim H (E) ensures that ∆ Φ (E) has positive Lebesque measure [41,7,6,15].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Peres and Schlag ( [32]) proved that if E Ă R d , d ě 2 and dim H pEq ą d` 1 2 , then Lp∆ x pEqq ą 0 for every x P E except for a set of small Hausdorff dimension. Improvements on the size of the exceptional set were obtained by the second listed author and Liu in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both results imply that if dim H (A) > 3/2, then there is y ∈ A such that dim H (∆ y A) = 1, and it is unknown whether 3/2 can be replaced by a smaller number. We remark that the results of both [24] and [12] extend to higher dimensions. These were the best known results towards Falconer's problem in the plane for general sets prior to this article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Recently, A. Iosevich and B. Liu [12] proved that (1.3) remains true with 3 + 3t − 3s in the right-hand side. This is an improvement in some parts of the parameter region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%