1995
DOI: 10.1006/pulp.1995.1015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pirenzepine Blunts the Pulmonary Parenchymal Response to Inhaled Methacholine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our previous report, 6 we demonstrated that the degree of inhibition of the parenchymal response by the relatively selective M1 subtype muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, was identical in the two groups of animals, despite the differences in their Mch sensitivity. This finding suggests that up-regulation of the expression of muscarinic receptors is not responsible, at least for the differences in parenchymal responsiveness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in our previous report, 6 we demonstrated that the degree of inhibition of the parenchymal response by the relatively selective M1 subtype muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, was identical in the two groups of animals, despite the differences in their Mch sensitivity. This finding suggests that up-regulation of the expression of muscarinic receptors is not responsible, at least for the differences in parenchymal responsiveness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Neither the present study nor our previous report 6 can determine the mechanism for the increased Mch responsiveness reported in animals exposed to an external environment. However, in our previous report, 6 we demonstrated that the degree of inhibition of the parenchymal response by the relatively selective M1 subtype muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, was identical in the two groups of animals, despite the differences in their Mch sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations