2016
DOI: 10.1080/10564934.2016.1185685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PISA as a Political Tool in Spain: Assessment Instrument, Academic Discourse and Political Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The general public, as well as the politicians of given countries, react to the test results. They are used to respond to current changes in educational policy (Gorur, 2016;Vega Gil et al, 2016). However, the indicator they are guided by is often only the ranking of the state's pupils (Kreiner and Christensen, 2014;Štech, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general public, as well as the politicians of given countries, react to the test results. They are used to respond to current changes in educational policy (Gorur, 2016;Vega Gil et al, 2016). However, the indicator they are guided by is often only the ranking of the state's pupils (Kreiner and Christensen, 2014;Štech, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En consecuencia, resulta pertinente que cada país realice sus propios estudios sobre el tema. No obstante, existen relativamente pocos estudios empíricos sobre las variables asociadas al logro en PISA (Vega, Hernández & García, 2016), y menos aún en México, donde el contexto y sistema educativo resultan muy diferente a los de los otros países de la OCDE (Martínez-Rizo, 2005). Por tanto, se considera relevante proponer un estudio analítico sobre los factores asociados a las puntuaciones que obtienen los estudiantes mexicanos en PISA, realizado a partir de los datos aportados por los cuestionarios de contexto que se aplican en esta prueba.…”
Section: Estudio Multinivel Sobre Las Variables Explicativas De Los Runclassified
“…'The globalisation of education' has resulted in increased global inequalities (Zajda, 2015;Connell, 2013), notwithstanding, the confusions and challenges of implementing global educational reforms (O'Leary & Wood, 2016). Since the advent of the PISA media 'phenomenon' educators and scholars have begun to see beyond the 'hype', for instance, Biesta (2015) indicates the deeper theoretical and practical consequences from an overt focus on 'numbers ', 'measurements' and 'comparisons' in education. PISA as a discursive construct has been problematised in relation to the ways PISA has had an adverse effect on teaching and learning (Serder & Ideland, 2016), in the ways PISA has shaped hegemonic discourses in terms of what is 'thinkable' and 'doable' in education (Bonal & Tarabini, 2013), and, how PISA has discursively been utilised as a political tool in shaping educational policies and national educational discourses (Vega Gil et al, 2016). Pocock (2014) hints at the problems of generalisations and assumptions in education especially with regard to essentialising peoples and/or groups, as Gamboa and Waltenberg (2015) show, PISA relies on a number of generalisations and assumptions about education systems and peoples alike.…”
Section: Educational Practice and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%