2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls and refinement of 2D cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This processing method typically inverses the 2D profile between two adjacent wells independently, followed by interpolation or extension to obtain the 3D velocity (slowness) structure. The 3D model construction method, which extrapolates the connecting well profiles using 2D profiles for interpolation and least squares fitting, can improve the accuracy of the profile and its adjacent structure, yet this is insufficient to obtain accurate 3D structures [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This processing method typically inverses the 2D profile between two adjacent wells independently, followed by interpolation or extension to obtain the 3D velocity (slowness) structure. The 3D model construction method, which extrapolates the connecting well profiles using 2D profiles for interpolation and least squares fitting, can improve the accuracy of the profile and its adjacent structure, yet this is insufficient to obtain accurate 3D structures [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are issues associated with imaging steep-dip interfaces (interfaces with dip angles exceeding 45 • ) [28]. In recent years, the rapidly developing RTM method follows the full-wave wave equation during wavefield extrapolation and is not limited by angles [29][30][31]. Among various pre-stack migration methods, RTM is considered the most accurate imaging technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%