2019
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in the interpretation of CFTR variants in the context of incidental findings

Abstract: Whole-exome/

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the class of CFTR-RD-causing variants is not referenced in CFTR2 and variants classified as CFTR-RD in CFTR-France may be found either as VVCC or not CF-causing in CFTR2. Other general databases such as ClinVar [42], and Human Gene Mutation Database ® [43], also provide clinical information and variant classification, mostly based on literature data, but numerous variants have been overclassified as "pathogenic" [44]. +: data available in the locus specific databases; -: data unavailable in the locus specific databases; LOVD: Leiden Open Variant Database [45]; NBS: newborn screening.…”
Section: Population Data (Clinical)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the class of CFTR-RD-causing variants is not referenced in CFTR2 and variants classified as CFTR-RD in CFTR-France may be found either as VVCC or not CF-causing in CFTR2. Other general databases such as ClinVar [42], and Human Gene Mutation Database ® [43], also provide clinical information and variant classification, mostly based on literature data, but numerous variants have been overclassified as "pathogenic" [44]. +: data available in the locus specific databases; -: data unavailable in the locus specific databases; LOVD: Leiden Open Variant Database [45]; NBS: newborn screening.…”
Section: Population Data (Clinical)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of wide genome analysis, aggregators that combine multiple evaluation tools have been implemented, such as Varsome [47] or Intervar [48]. They may be of help but exhibit significant limitations for CFTR variants, displaying a high degree of uncertainty for numerous variants [44].…”
Section: Computational and Predictive Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Updated information should be provided to families as knowledge evolves on variant pathogenicity, but such recalls could also generate anxiety. Population genetics data should not be neglected, as it has been shown that a number of variants classified as VUS or VVCC in CFTR2 actually have a frequency in the general population that argues against a severe impact, as for c.2620-26A>G, R74W, R117H, I556V, or D1270N [65]. The risk is to consider neonates as carriers of a CF-causing variant and to offer inappropriate genetic counseling and testing in the family, and eventually inappropriate prenatal diagnosis.…”
Section: Carrier Detection and Genetic Counselingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08. 13.453827 doi: bioRxiv preprint…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STXBP1 has a wide range of functions, including the transport of Syntaxin 1A (STX1A), a vesicular release protein, from the soma to the synapse via binding at STX1A's Habc subdomain 12 . STXBP1 also enables Syntaxin to form SNARES at the synaptic terminal and fuse with the membrane for vesicular release via binding at a second site, the N-terminal [13][14][15][16][17][18] (Figure 1B). Models of STXBP1 dysfunction exist across the entire spectrum of research animals and cell lines, including yeast, flies, worms, mice, HEK293 cell culture, and differentiated fibroblasts, underlining its importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%