2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitting resistance of 316 stainless steel after laser shock peening: Determinants of microstructural and mechanical modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study showed that the USRP was able to prevent the corrosion of an austenitic stainless steel surface due to a stable passive film and its small surface roughness [19]. The residual compressive stress induced by plastic deformation during the USRP played a beneficial role in the resistance to corrosion [20]. It was found that the hydrophobicity of a surface modified with the USRP was enhanced in our previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study showed that the USRP was able to prevent the corrosion of an austenitic stainless steel surface due to a stable passive film and its small surface roughness [19]. The residual compressive stress induced by plastic deformation during the USRP played a beneficial role in the resistance to corrosion [20]. It was found that the hydrophobicity of a surface modified with the USRP was enhanced in our previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Severe plastic deformation was able to result in a high surface residual compressive stress during the USRP treatment. The residual compressive stress was able to inhibit the metastable pitting in nucleation [20]. The residual compressive stress made the passive film more robust and compact because of the slightly lower interatomic distances in the underlying compressively stressed metal lattice [25].…”
Section: Corrosion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps minimize the microcracks between intermetallic and matrix steels (Guan et al, 2022) and suppress the penetration of Cl À through the passive film (Trdan and Grum, 2012). However, other investigations confirmed that a similar (Liu et al, 2019) or even worse (Guan et al, 2021) pitting resistance was obtained after the LSP treatment, which may be resulted from the increase in surface roughness as mentioned in Table 1. Compared with SP and LSP, WJP is a surface strengthening technology introducing lower materials damage and middle magnitude residual compressive stress as discussed in Section 3.1.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Peening On Corrosion Behavior Of Stainless...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Structural steels such as 316, 321, UNS S44600, 17–4 PH steels, 253 MA and P91 steels were laser peened and significantly improved hardness. SS 316 steel showed a hardness of around 7 GPa compared to 4 GPa of unpeened samples [119]. Karthik et al investigation on AISI 321 [120] 17–4 PH steels [121] showed an increase in hardness and work hardening after laser peeing.…”
Section: Effect Of Laser Peening On Microstructural and Materials Pro...mentioning
confidence: 99%