2021
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pixel‐level multicategory detection of visible seismic damage of reinforced concrete components

Abstract: The detection of visible damage (i.e., cracking, concrete spalling and crushing, reinforcement exposure, buckling and fracture) plays a key role in postearthquake safety assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) building structures. In this study, a novel approach based on computer-vision techniques was developed for pixel-level multicategory detection of visible seismic damage of RC components. A semantic segmentation database was constructed from test photos of RC structural components. Series of datasets were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the specification (AQSIQ, 2009), the extent of damage is defined as follow: (a) the visible cracks on the surface of the floated coat or mortar joint; (b) crack width less than 0.5 mm; (c) crack width more than 0.5 mm and surface spalling; (d) the surface of components severe spalling and rebars exposed obviously; and (e) parts of the components crushed and rebars buckled. According to the damage description in literature (Miao et al., 2021) and the simulated damage contour plots under different damage levels, the corresponding relationship between damage level (none damage, minor damage, moderate damage, severe damage, and collapse) and the most severe damage (fine crack, wide crack, concrete spalling, exposed rebar, and buckled rebar) on the component surface was established as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Rc Component and Structure Damage Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in the specification (AQSIQ, 2009), the extent of damage is defined as follow: (a) the visible cracks on the surface of the floated coat or mortar joint; (b) crack width less than 0.5 mm; (c) crack width more than 0.5 mm and surface spalling; (d) the surface of components severe spalling and rebars exposed obviously; and (e) parts of the components crushed and rebars buckled. According to the damage description in literature (Miao et al., 2021) and the simulated damage contour plots under different damage levels, the corresponding relationship between damage level (none damage, minor damage, moderate damage, severe damage, and collapse) and the most severe damage (fine crack, wide crack, concrete spalling, exposed rebar, and buckled rebar) on the component surface was established as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Rc Component and Structure Damage Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies have great success in damage detection (Ghosh Mondal et al., 2020) and segmentation (S. Li et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2018), the research of how to correlate the detection (segmentation) results with damage states of components (Cheng et al., 2021) and how to correlate damage states of components with structural damage states effectively is relatively lacking (Gulgec et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been at the forefront of a plethora of research activities in many disciplines, where topics in structural engineering, for example, system parameter identification (Perez‐Ramirez et al., 2016), bolt loosening detection (Yang et al., n.d.), and crack detection, significantly benefit from these technologies. In order to reduce the cost and safety risk while improving detection accuracy and automation, researchers have proposed a variety of image detection technologies combining ML/DL with CV to recognize cracks (Kong et al., 2021; Liang, 2019; Miao et al., 2021; Żarski et al., 2021; Zhang & Yuen, 2021). In general, vision‐based crack detection has three main tasks: identification, localization, and segmentation.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable studies include research on the detection of cracks in concrete Deng et al, 2020;Dung, 2019;Jang et al, 2021;Jiang & Zhang, 2020;Kong et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2019;Y. Liu et al, 2019;Miao et al, 2021;Sajedi & Liang, 2021; and asphalt pavements (F. Guo et al, 2021;Li et al, 2020;Maeda et al, 2018;Maeda et al, 2021) and in the detection of defects and leaks in tunnels (Huang et al, 2018;Xue & Li, 2018). Further, research has been conducted on evaluating the soundness of structures using vibration (Avci et al, 2021;Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2019;, 2018aShrestha & Dang, 2020) and on assessing the internal damage to concrete using nondestructive testing (Chun & Hayashi 2021;Chun, Ujike, et al, 2020;Erdal et al, 2018;Sirca et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%