Place and Child Health: The Interaction of Population Density and Sanitation in Developing Countries

Abstract

A long literature in demography has debated the importance of place for health, especially children’s health. In this study, we assess whether the importance of dense settlement for infant mortality and child height is moderated by exposure to local sanitation behavior. Is open defecation (i.e., without a toilet or latrine) worse for infant mortality and child height where population density is greater? Is poor sanitation is an important mechanism by which population density influences child health outcomes? We present two complementary analyses using newly assembled data sets, which represent two points in a trade-off between external and internal validity. First, we concentrate on external validity by studying infant mortality and child height in a large, international child-level data set of 172 Demographic and Health Surveys, matched to census population density data for 1,800 subnational regions. Second, we concentrate on internal validity by studying child height in Bangladeshi districts, using a new data set constructed with GIS techniques that allows us to control for fixed effects at a high level of geographic resolution. We find a statistically robust and quantitatively comparable interaction between sanitation and population density with both approaches: open defecation externalities are more important for child health outcomes where people live more closely together.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0538-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Switching to sanitation: Understanding latrine adoption in a representative panel of rural Indian households

“…Unfortunately, achieving such a large first stage change in latrine adoption has proven difficult in rural India. Arguably, recent intervention studies of the effect of open defecation on health (Clasen et al (2014) is a recent example from rural Orissa; Patil et al (2014) is an example from Madhya Pradesh) may have not detected the effects on health outcomes that are found in population-level studies (Hathi et al, 2017; Coffey et al, forthcoming) because too much open defecation remained in the villages they studied even after latrine promotion interventions.…”

Sanitation, Disease Externalities and Anaemia: Evidence From Nepal

“…In panel ( b ), we modify the horizontal axis so that it measures the log of open defaecation per Square Kilometre, following recent literature showing that the risk of transmitting pathogens via open defaecation is increasing in population density (Spears, ; Hathi et al ., ). Data on total land area and population, which are used to construct the measure of open defaecation per Square Kilometre, come from the Penn World Tables.…”

Assessment of Fecal Exposure Pathways in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods in Accra, Ghana: Rationale, Design, Methods, and Key Findings of the SaniPath Study

“…27 The abundant sources of fecal contamination within the public domain, combined with a wide range of exposure behaviors and high population density, place urban residents, especially children, at a high risk of exposure to fecal contamination. 28 …”