2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place-based tax exemptions and displacement effects: An evaluation of the Zones Franches Urbaines program

Abstract: Les documents de travail ne reflètent pas la position du CREST et n'engagent que leurs auteurs. Working papers do not reflect the position of CREST but only the views of the authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
2
21

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
92
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, only a fraction of PIOs fill the standard fiscal forms, so that this data only covers 8% of the PIOs that are present in our main sample, and underrepresents larger establishments, which are the main beneficiaries of the ZRR program according to partial evidence reported in Daniel et al (2009). With this caveat in mind, we do not find any impact of the ZRR program on the balance sheet or on other 33 As noted above, while the first wave of the rural EZ program evaluated by Givord et al (2012) had very large employment effects, impacts in later waves were positive and significant, yet more modest (Givord et al, 2013).…”
Section: Why Did the 2005 Program Fail To Boost Public Interest Organmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, only a fraction of PIOs fill the standard fiscal forms, so that this data only covers 8% of the PIOs that are present in our main sample, and underrepresents larger establishments, which are the main beneficiaries of the ZRR program according to partial evidence reported in Daniel et al (2009). With this caveat in mind, we do not find any impact of the ZRR program on the balance sheet or on other 33 As noted above, while the first wave of the rural EZ program evaluated by Givord et al (2012) had very large employment effects, impacts in later waves were positive and significant, yet more modest (Givord et al, 2013).…”
Section: Why Did the 2005 Program Fail To Boost Public Interest Organmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Its estimated effects on employment and the number of businesses are also positive and statistically significant, yet smaller than the estimated effects of the first urban EZ program that we use as a benchmark (Givord et al, 2013). The reasons for the differential impact of the two urban EZ programs are not clear.…”
Section: Comparing the Zrr Program Impacts To Its Urban Counterpartmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations