2013
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.842274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place Meanings and Participatory Planning Intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective forest management depends on understanding the cultural importance of places for local communities and stakeholders, which can shape community response to landscape change or proposed actions (Kil et al . ).…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effective forest management depends on understanding the cultural importance of places for local communities and stakeholders, which can shape community response to landscape change or proposed actions (Kil et al . ).…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Enduring personal relationships between federal employees and members of local communities are also important but are difficult to maintain given the frequent relocation of agency personnel, driven by personal decisions or agency policy (Cerveny et al 2018). Effective forest management depends on understanding the cultural importance of places for local communities and stakeholders, which can shape community response to landscape change or proposed actions (Kil et al 2014).…”
Section: Collaboration Is Essentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) to link the intangible place meanings that individuals associated with the dammed river environment to other factors that may influence acceptance of dam removal. The framework draws on research on place meanings (Williams and Patterson 1999, Davenport and Anderson 2005, Smith et al 2011, Kil et al 2014) and research that conceptualizes project opposition as a desire to protect places (Stedman 2002, Devine-Wright 2009, Devine-Wright and Howes 2010, Anderson et al 2013. Here, we focused on the concepts in bold (Fig.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies distinguish two main types of place meanings: tangible and intangible (Table 1; Williams and Patterson 1999, Davenport and Anderson 2005, Smith et al 2011, Kil et al 2014. Tangible meanings are defined as properties of the location and can therefore be viewed as objective, verifiable, and relatively functional.…”
Section: Forms and Development Of Place Meaningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation