2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Places for active outdoor recreation – a scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For visitors who visited the Calligraphy Greenway, the attribute with the greatest utility was the recreational service quality (34.08%), so visitors considered the recreational service quality to be the most important factor, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies [28,31]. The recreational facilities that visitors considered to be most important include walking paths, street lamps, public restrooms and trash bins.…”
Section: Analyzing Preferences For the Recreational Attributessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For visitors who visited the Calligraphy Greenway, the attribute with the greatest utility was the recreational service quality (34.08%), so visitors considered the recreational service quality to be the most important factor, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies [28,31]. The recreational facilities that visitors considered to be most important include walking paths, street lamps, public restrooms and trash bins.…”
Section: Analyzing Preferences For the Recreational Attributessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For visitors to the Calligraphy Greenway, a quality of service facility that is too low leads to an extremely negative recreational experience. This result shows that the higher the recreational service quality, the greater the utility value [28,31].…”
Section: Analyzing Preferences For the Recreational Attributesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accessibility, however, is not necessarily consistent with distance and relates to the experience of proximity and access to a special area. Accessibility may be affected by infrastructure, among others, and good accessibility seems to be positively associated with participation in active outdoor recreation (Andkjaer & Arvidsen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors could be said to influence youth-driven force to visit recreational facilities (Omar et al, 2017). To be accessible to the recreational activity area is not necessarily related to distance and proximity, rather the availability that motivates, hence easy reach to the facility (Andkjaer & Arvidsen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%